Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="tetrasodium" data-source="post: 7919820" data-attributes="member: 93670">I do similar but tend to use things like the <a href="https://eberron.fandom.com/wiki/Oalian" target="_blank">greatpine oalian</a> &amp; greatwenge Weald. Millennias old awakened trees that may have been awakened by the black dragon <a href="https://eberron.fandom.com/wiki/Vvaraak" target="_blank">Vvaraak</a> are certain to be better repositories of knowledge than some demon overlord claiming to be a god of nature too <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" alt="🌲" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f332.png" title="Evergreen tree&nbsp; &nbsp; :evergreen_tree:" data-shortname=":evergreen_tree:" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" />[ATTACH=full]118432[/ATTACH][USER=50987]@CleverNickName[/USER] I think that a psionic type that doesn't dual type it's powers like I suggested for magic would go back to the rules hazzard you had with psionics in past editions.&nbsp; There's nothing wrong with a Wizard's fireball being elemental, arcane while a mystic is elemental, psionic[USER=1125]@Tonguez[/USER] one is arcane, primal &amp; the other is nature, primal?&nbsp; Alternatively enhance ability would only be on one list &amp; some other thematically appropriate version with different mechanics would be on the other list if such a thing were needed.&nbsp; Admittedly I'm not sure that I've ever seen someone cast enhance ability in 5e &amp; run both a private weekly game as well as an AL weekly game.&nbsp; I'm sure someone does but it's&nbsp; a pretty bad spell in 5e &amp; being sorcerer specific makes it near untenable as a&nbsp; deliberate choice for a known spell</blockquote>

[QUOTE="tetrasodium, post: 7919820, member: 93670"] I do similar but tend to use things like the [URL='https://eberron.fandom.com/wiki/Oalian']greatpine oalian[/URL] & greatwenge Weald. Millennias old awakened trees that may have been awakened by the black dragon [URL='https://eberron.fandom.com/wiki/Vvaraak']Vvaraak[/URL] are certain to be better repositories of knowledge than some demon overlord claiming to be a god of nature too 🌲 [ATTACH type="full" alt="1581821144294.png"]118432[/ATTACH] [USER=50987]@CleverNickName[/USER] I think that a psionic type that doesn't dual type it's powers like I suggested for magic would go back to the rules hazzard you had with psionics in past editions. There's nothing wrong with a Wizard's fireball being elemental, arcane while a mystic is elemental, psionic [USER=1125]@Tonguez[/USER] one is arcane, primal & the other is nature, primal? Alternatively enhance ability would only be on one list & some other thematically appropriate version with different mechanics would be on the other list if such a thing were needed. Admittedly I'm not sure that I've [I]ever[/I] seen someone cast enhance ability in 5e & run both a private weekly game as well as an AL weekly game. I'm sure someone does but it's a pretty bad spell in 5e & being sorcerer specific makes it near untenable as a deliberate choice for a known spell [/QUOTE]

Verification