Centurion (2010)

Mark CMG

Creative Mountain Games
This one has opened up outside the USA and is gaining some traction -

Centurion (2010)

The trailers look decent for a popcorn flick on the big screen. I will probably see it when it opens here August 27th.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Even though I'm painfully tired of "badass heroines" in film, and even though I seriously loathed Doomsday, I'm really looking forward to this one. I thought Dog Soldiers and The Descent were brilliant, so I'm willing to give Marshall the benefit of the doubt. I just hope it's every bit as awesome as it deserves to be.
 


Saw it on On Demand, great action movie! Very entertaining and violent, and plenty of cool Roman action in it. The plot is simple and straight forward, but then again it's not really a movie to see for the story.
-Inquisitor Leet
 

My greatest complaint is that it wasn't more epic. At only 90 minutes, it felt like they missed an opportunity to really flesh out the characters (something that was sorely needed), steadily increase the tension and sense of overwhelming dread, and just generally add more meat to the action.

Also, the fighting (particularly the first major battle) seemed poorly shot and/or edited. I really, really, really hate how so many directors these days feel compelled to push in on the action, getting so close that you can't really tell what the hell is going on. And then they compound that error by cutting things so quickly, which, I understand is meant to convey the frantic, chaotic feel of actual combat but it ultimately just leaves me feeling lost and disconnected as I lose all sense of the battle. I found that really frustrating.

And, sadly, the ending felt somewhat anticlimactic and more than a little awkward. I wish it had been handled differently.

I think an additional 30-40 minutes of quality writing/footage, if they'd made a greater effort to develop the characters and build some sort of emotional connection between them and the audience, if they'd done more with the action, and if they'd found a better way of bringing things to a close, it would have made the movie something really special. As it is...on a scale of 1-10, it's somewhere around a 6 or so. Worth a watch, but a little disappointing when you realize there's a lot of wasted potential and it could have been a much better, more satisfying on every level movie.
 



Romans gettign the asses kciked by hairy painted wild assed Scots, what's not to like! :p

Was actually pretty good, though I DO wish they'd have used a less pretty/more rough looking main female lead, many of the men were European so not so damn plastic/perfect as many American actors in past 2 decades, which is vital for the illusion of "reality", you don'tget bloody ROmans Pict,s or most fantasy folk either, having perfect teeth and skin, ya know ;)
 

Also, the fighting (particularly the first major battle) seemed poorly shot and/or edited. I really, really, really hate how so many directors these days feel compelled to push in on the action, getting so close that you can't really tell what the hell is going on. And then they compound that error by cutting things so quickly, which, I understand is meant to convey the frantic, chaotic feel of actual combat but it ultimately just leaves me feeling lost and disconnected as I lose all sense of the battle. I found that really frustrating.

I think it's a cheat, it allows them to avoid any real fight choreography and give the illusion of it without any real work or talent.
 

Remove ads

Top