Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Chainmail Bikinis & other Cheesecake art in the 4th Edition Core Books.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="small pumpkin man" data-source="post: 3967511" data-attributes="member: 57910"><p>It would appear it's my turn to get dressed down. Excellent. (although it's not like I drew it or anything.)</p><p></p><p>Spellcaster? monk? or possibly just her day off? She's obviously not adventuring <em>right now</em>, she's sitting around in comfortable clothes, a time when many people do wear less than they would in public, especially less than they do "on the job" as it were, this would be the "verisimilitude" and "appropriate" part, and it doesn't prevent her from kicking butt at a later date.</p><p></p><p>Redhead, Redhead's do not tan.</p><p></p><p>she looks a bit dusty to me actually, if you mean no blemishes, then yeah, she's hot, I never said this was a bad thing, but she does look slightly unkept (the hair, and a bit of dust), she does look like she's been outdoors. (although she may well be wearing makeup on her face)</p><p></p><p>Day off in the forest, <em>appropriate</em>.</p><p></p><p>That, or they're just fur.</p><p></p><p></p><p>She's sitting in the forest eating some berries, there's nothing seductive about the pose (although the face is a different thing), she looks like a normal attractive woman in a situation where's it's not inappropriate to show skin, she's not submissive or desperate, it's just a day in the life thing, y'know, as opposed to "on the job", when an actual adventurer is going to be wearing work clothes for outside, which generally aren't that flattering, attractive, sure, but not really sexy, or cheesecake, makes it "inappropriate".</p><p></p><p>Klous's #2 pic is a heroine, she's kicking butt and taking names (not that can remember why you take names when you kick butt right now), with #1, I see a model wearing fetish gear based of timeline appropriate armour, which makes her more of a parody of a heroine to me.</p><p></p><p>She's actually a "fist of the forest" I believe, some sort of monk/druid, that is, the kind of person who hangs around in the forest in unrestrictive clothes, you're right in that she's not looking overly assertive/buttkicking right now, my point is that if your feel the need to show some sexy, you can do it in the down time, or with appropriate characters, in appropriate clothing, (obligatory comment about how D&D isn't <em>just</em> about combat) as opposed to front line fighters, for whom it could be life threatening to show skin "on the job" as it were, especially when the male fighter beside her is wearing the same thing without the holes. (no, not evidenced here, but it will happen if you stick with that kind of armour)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="small pumpkin man, post: 3967511, member: 57910"] It would appear it's my turn to get dressed down. Excellent. (although it's not like I drew it or anything.) Spellcaster? monk? or possibly just her day off? She's obviously not adventuring [i]right now[/i], she's sitting around in comfortable clothes, a time when many people do wear less than they would in public, especially less than they do "on the job" as it were, this would be the "verisimilitude" and "appropriate" part, and it doesn't prevent her from kicking butt at a later date. Redhead, Redhead's do not tan. she looks a bit dusty to me actually, if you mean no blemishes, then yeah, she's hot, I never said this was a bad thing, but she does look slightly unkept (the hair, and a bit of dust), she does look like she's been outdoors. (although she may well be wearing makeup on her face) Day off in the forest, [i]appropriate[/i]. That, or they're just fur. She's sitting in the forest eating some berries, there's nothing seductive about the pose (although the face is a different thing), she looks like a normal attractive woman in a situation where's it's not inappropriate to show skin, she's not submissive or desperate, it's just a day in the life thing, y'know, as opposed to "on the job", when an actual adventurer is going to be wearing work clothes for outside, which generally aren't that flattering, attractive, sure, but not really sexy, or cheesecake, makes it "inappropriate". Klous's #2 pic is a heroine, she's kicking butt and taking names (not that can remember why you take names when you kick butt right now), with #1, I see a model wearing fetish gear based of timeline appropriate armour, which makes her more of a parody of a heroine to me. She's actually a "fist of the forest" I believe, some sort of monk/druid, that is, the kind of person who hangs around in the forest in unrestrictive clothes, you're right in that she's not looking overly assertive/buttkicking right now, my point is that if your feel the need to show some sexy, you can do it in the down time, or with appropriate characters, in appropriate clothing, (obligatory comment about how D&D isn't [i]just[/i] about combat) as opposed to front line fighters, for whom it could be life threatening to show skin "on the job" as it were, especially when the male fighter beside her is wearing the same thing without the holes. (no, not evidenced here, but it will happen if you stick with that kind of armour) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Chainmail Bikinis & other Cheesecake art in the 4th Edition Core Books.
Top