Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Chainmail Bikinis & other Cheesecake art in the 4th Edition Core Books.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Xanaqui" data-source="post: 3967941" data-attributes="member: 56394"><p><strong>art and gender</strong></p><p></p><p>Personally, I think that there are two traps that one can get into:</p><p></p><p>1) Portraying one gender in a vastly different manner than the other.</p><p>For example, if all your males are bound, scantily clad, and sexy, and all the females are muscular, heavily armored, and fighting the monsters guarding the males, unless your entire market is Femdomme (unlikely in the general marketplace), you probably should re-consider.</p><p></p><p>2) Only portraying one gender, or portraying one gender extremely disproportionately to the other.</p><p>Unless your entire market is that gender (unlikely in the general marketplace), you probably should re-consider.</p><p></p><p>In either case, I think that art selection matters more on the publisher than the individual artist. With that caveat in mind, my comment on Klaus's <a href="http://www.enworld.org/showpost.php?p=3964422&postcount=24" target="_blank">first three images</a> (note that my intent is not to offend; apologies if I do):</p><p></p><p>1) Questionable, largely due to the bikini bottom. It really depends on what other art is in the same source; if there are males running around in similar attire, I'd have no objection.</p><p>2) My comments would more be of the difficulty in understanding how they got into this position than anything about either creature's attire. The implication seems to be that they came off of the landing, but then I'd expect the creature in the forefront to either have its feet closer to the landing (note that due to its position, its head had to have started falling prior to its feet), or to have fallen further. In either case, the human's hair, arms, and leg position appear to contradict each other. The hair indicates moving straight into the creature; the body position indicates a straight drop onto the (presumably already falling) creature, and the leg position more suggests that she's riding with her knees on a flying creature. Perhaps the human is supposed to be able to more perpendicular to the direction of gravity temporarily, then starts falling with the creature? That might explain most of the position, but then the sword would likely have started inside the floor.</p><p>3) Looks fine to me, although the humanoid's face seems a bit flat in aspect (not an issue in the other two samples). A couple other things I note are that although the humanoid's hair is clearly being blown by the wind, that doesn't seem to affect the wolf's fur. It's unclear how her quiver is secured at the top, and the wolf's left eye is a bit off of where I'd normally expect.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Xanaqui, post: 3967941, member: 56394"] [b]art and gender[/b] Personally, I think that there are two traps that one can get into: 1) Portraying one gender in a vastly different manner than the other. For example, if all your males are bound, scantily clad, and sexy, and all the females are muscular, heavily armored, and fighting the monsters guarding the males, unless your entire market is Femdomme (unlikely in the general marketplace), you probably should re-consider. 2) Only portraying one gender, or portraying one gender extremely disproportionately to the other. Unless your entire market is that gender (unlikely in the general marketplace), you probably should re-consider. In either case, I think that art selection matters more on the publisher than the individual artist. With that caveat in mind, my comment on Klaus's [URL=http://www.enworld.org/showpost.php?p=3964422&postcount=24]first three images[/URL] (note that my intent is not to offend; apologies if I do): 1) Questionable, largely due to the bikini bottom. It really depends on what other art is in the same source; if there are males running around in similar attire, I'd have no objection. 2) My comments would more be of the difficulty in understanding how they got into this position than anything about either creature's attire. The implication seems to be that they came off of the landing, but then I'd expect the creature in the forefront to either have its feet closer to the landing (note that due to its position, its head had to have started falling prior to its feet), or to have fallen further. In either case, the human's hair, arms, and leg position appear to contradict each other. The hair indicates moving straight into the creature; the body position indicates a straight drop onto the (presumably already falling) creature, and the leg position more suggests that she's riding with her knees on a flying creature. Perhaps the human is supposed to be able to more perpendicular to the direction of gravity temporarily, then starts falling with the creature? That might explain most of the position, but then the sword would likely have started inside the floor. 3) Looks fine to me, although the humanoid's face seems a bit flat in aspect (not an issue in the other two samples). A couple other things I note are that although the humanoid's hair is clearly being blown by the wind, that doesn't seem to affect the wolf's fur. It's unclear how her quiver is secured at the top, and the wolf's left eye is a bit off of where I'd normally expect. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Chainmail Bikinis & other Cheesecake art in the 4th Edition Core Books.
Top