Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Wulf Ratbane" data-source="post: 4608108" data-attributes="member: 94">It's really not a question of being smart enough to fix the problems. Certainly WoTC is smart enough to fix design problems. The issue at hand is agreeing on the revised list of design criteria. WoTC's 4e design criteria included a long list of things that not only weren't perceived problems for many folks, the changes they pushed through made some folks even more recalcitrant. Some of the things on the 4e redesign list were purely marketing/legal/IP considerations-- clean design had nothing to do with it.Even taking a step back from that-- throw out all the marketing changes-- there's <a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/general-rpg-discussion/222801-3-5e-what-really-needed-fixing.html" target="_blank">no clear consensus</a> from 3e players on what mechanics needed fixing.At any rate, I am sure somebody will take a stab at that perfect system.  <a href="http://www.badaxegames.com/?p=86" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/angel.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":angel:" title="Angel    :angel:" data-shortname=":angel:" /></a></blockquote>