Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Changeover Poll
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BryonD" data-source="post: 4608807" data-attributes="member: 957"><p>Key word: "financially"</p><p></p><p>When 3E came out, people with stacks of 2E books went and bought stacks of 3E books. The fraction of the fan base with stacks of 3E books that has started buying stacks of 4E books is decidedly smaller. I believe WotC wanted to target a wider range of fans. But if they have succeeded in trading one fan who bought a book a month for 4 fans who each buy less than a book a year, then they have made a bad deal. But hey, at least those "fans" are not so financially invested that they won't switch straight to buying nothing for 5E. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>WotC has most certainly lowered the bar and made D&D more accessible to casual gamers. But it has also made a game that is a lot less appealing to people who think of themselves as gamers as an overall group. And please don't bother explaining to me how you are completely the opposite of this claim. I'm certain there are quite a large number of you reading this. Unless you intend to buy a few thousand of the next 4E supplement, it doesn't change the point.</p><p></p><p>I also struggle with the idea that it seems that "emotionally invested" gamers prefer 3E and yet the numbers for 4E are low (in part) because we are still waiting for all these less emotionally invested, certain to switch over to 4E, gamers to wrap up their 3E games six months later. My campaigns generally run a year or two. So it is certainly possible, but the idea that a meaningful number of would be 4E, non-emotionally invested gamers cranked up a new 3E campaign in the final six months of the the pre-release hype and now can't bear to leave that game and move on, is a bit hard to swallow. I mean, the whole premise is a lack of emotional investment...</p><p></p><p>I still think that a low bar recruiting strategy is a very short sighted plan for table top gaming. (and perhaps there is my flaw and maybe WotC doesn't care to have a long term plan for table top gaming. I'm not claiming they don't, I'm just throwing out the possibility) </p><p></p><p>I still believe that a sizable fraction of the non-gamers who have joined in to the easy, accessible new system will move on to the next new thing sooner rather than later. And I also think that a sizable fraction of the gamers who do like 4E will find that the simplifications will lead to a much more rapid been-there, done-that than is typical. And I know, not you. I'm not talking about you. I'm talking about community.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BryonD, post: 4608807, member: 957"] Key word: "financially" When 3E came out, people with stacks of 2E books went and bought stacks of 3E books. The fraction of the fan base with stacks of 3E books that has started buying stacks of 4E books is decidedly smaller. I believe WotC wanted to target a wider range of fans. But if they have succeeded in trading one fan who bought a book a month for 4 fans who each buy less than a book a year, then they have made a bad deal. But hey, at least those "fans" are not so financially invested that they won't switch straight to buying nothing for 5E. :) WotC has most certainly lowered the bar and made D&D more accessible to casual gamers. But it has also made a game that is a lot less appealing to people who think of themselves as gamers as an overall group. And please don't bother explaining to me how you are completely the opposite of this claim. I'm certain there are quite a large number of you reading this. Unless you intend to buy a few thousand of the next 4E supplement, it doesn't change the point. I also struggle with the idea that it seems that "emotionally invested" gamers prefer 3E and yet the numbers for 4E are low (in part) because we are still waiting for all these less emotionally invested, certain to switch over to 4E, gamers to wrap up their 3E games six months later. My campaigns generally run a year or two. So it is certainly possible, but the idea that a meaningful number of would be 4E, non-emotionally invested gamers cranked up a new 3E campaign in the final six months of the the pre-release hype and now can't bear to leave that game and move on, is a bit hard to swallow. I mean, the whole premise is a lack of emotional investment... I still think that a low bar recruiting strategy is a very short sighted plan for table top gaming. (and perhaps there is my flaw and maybe WotC doesn't care to have a long term plan for table top gaming. I'm not claiming they don't, I'm just throwing out the possibility) I still believe that a sizable fraction of the non-gamers who have joined in to the easy, accessible new system will move on to the next new thing sooner rather than later. And I also think that a sizable fraction of the gamers who do like 4E will find that the simplifications will lead to a much more rapid been-there, done-that than is typical. And I know, not you. I'm not talking about you. I'm talking about community. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Changeover Poll
Top