Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Changeover Poll
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="merelycompetent" data-source="post: 4610367" data-attributes="member: 33830"><p>I voted: Tried 4E, went back to an earlier edition.</p><p></p><p>I read the previews with relish. I really liked what the designers were talking about - especially making 4E more DM-friendly, and supporting high-level play. I was a little nervous about the warnings that existing campaigns would not be (easily) convertible to 4E, but took a wait-and-see approach.</p><p></p><p>Then I got the 4E Core Rules, and my jaw hit the floor.</p><p></p><p>The campaign world that I have worked on through four editions of the game was incompatible with the race and cosmology changes. Some of the class changes, on read-through, would require reworking parts of the campaign setting. There was no conversion available to go from 3.5E to 4E. On top of that, I'd have to wait for certain classes to be published that used to be considered core - such as the Druid. I'd end up re-designing and re-writing too much of my main campaign setting to handle 4E mechanics. As a DM with this campaign world, I am no longer part of WotC's target customer base.</p><p></p><p>As a player, I'm very open to 4E. I'd love to really take the rules for a test run. As a DM, I'm willing to run some one-shots to really see if the new mechanics work like I think they will. But unless inspiration strikes in a good way, someone else comes up with a usable conversion, or I decide to scrap my main campaign setting, I'm going to just cherry-pick some ideas, and not purchase anything beyond the 4E Core Rules.</p><p></p><p>Don't get me wrong: 4E looks *cool*. And if I ever scrap my main campaign setting, I'll probably use it (if it's still the main supported edition). But that is not likely to happen soon with characters at only 13th level.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="merelycompetent, post: 4610367, member: 33830"] I voted: Tried 4E, went back to an earlier edition. I read the previews with relish. I really liked what the designers were talking about - especially making 4E more DM-friendly, and supporting high-level play. I was a little nervous about the warnings that existing campaigns would not be (easily) convertible to 4E, but took a wait-and-see approach. Then I got the 4E Core Rules, and my jaw hit the floor. The campaign world that I have worked on through four editions of the game was incompatible with the race and cosmology changes. Some of the class changes, on read-through, would require reworking parts of the campaign setting. There was no conversion available to go from 3.5E to 4E. On top of that, I'd have to wait for certain classes to be published that used to be considered core - such as the Druid. I'd end up re-designing and re-writing too much of my main campaign setting to handle 4E mechanics. As a DM with this campaign world, I am no longer part of WotC's target customer base. As a player, I'm very open to 4E. I'd love to really take the rules for a test run. As a DM, I'm willing to run some one-shots to really see if the new mechanics work like I think they will. But unless inspiration strikes in a good way, someone else comes up with a usable conversion, or I decide to scrap my main campaign setting, I'm going to just cherry-pick some ideas, and not purchase anything beyond the 4E Core Rules. Don't get me wrong: 4E looks *cool*. And if I ever scrap my main campaign setting, I'll probably use it (if it's still the main supported edition). But that is not likely to happen soon with characters at only 13th level. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Changeover Poll
Top