Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Crimson Longinus" data-source="post: 8065260" data-attributes="member: 7025508">But it is.Yes. They could produce much more food. But that food was less diverse and had less nutrients, especially protein.Yes. This indeed was the case.Yes it does. This was one part of the reason why they were larger and generally healthier (when not eaten by sabre-tooth tigers.)YES! Yes.Not sure about that being related...They had more (but poorer quality) food, thus could support larger population, That is literally the whole bloody point of farming. Everyone doesn't need to be hunting and gathering all the time, some people can just farm and feed the rest who can do other stuff. But the farmers were not healthier, this has been studied. They however led much safer lives.Sure. And then no one needs special bonuses over others.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Crimson Longinus, post: 8065260, member: 7025508"] But it is. Yes. They could produce much more food. But that food was less diverse and had less nutrients, especially protein. Yes. This indeed was the case. Yes it does. This was one part of the reason why they were larger and generally healthier (when not eaten by sabre-tooth tigers.) YES! Yes. Not sure about that being related... They had more (but poorer quality) food, thus could support larger population, That is literally the whole bloody point of farming. Everyone doesn't need to be hunting and gathering all the time, some people can just farm and feed the rest who can do other stuff. But the farmers were not healthier, this has been studied. They however led much safer lives. Sure. And then no one needs special bonuses over others. [/QUOTE]

Verification