Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Char-op Box
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Stuntman" data-source="post: 5088738" data-attributes="member: 84817"><p>My experience with 4E is that you don't need to have a highly optimised character in order for your character to perform adequately. That extra bit of optimisation that you can do is only noticeable by those who are really into optimising. Personally, I would tend to notice any +1 that I could have gotten with a slightly different build. It actually does bug me a bit sometimes when I see others with clearly suboptimal characters. However, seeing how they perform in a real situation, I don't see any great drop off in performance compared to a highly optimised character.</p><p></p><p>I think that optimisers tend to have a much higher standard for what is considered adequate compared to non-optimisers. When looking at theoretical situations and all bonuses, an optimiser can spot unoptimised discrepancies which appear really glaring. A non-optimiser may understand that if they built it a different way, they may get an extra +1 here or there. However, when it comes down to actually playing, I think the non-optimiser will notice bad die rolls more so that perhaps one fewer damage here or there.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Stuntman, post: 5088738, member: 84817"] My experience with 4E is that you don't need to have a highly optimised character in order for your character to perform adequately. That extra bit of optimisation that you can do is only noticeable by those who are really into optimising. Personally, I would tend to notice any +1 that I could have gotten with a slightly different build. It actually does bug me a bit sometimes when I see others with clearly suboptimal characters. However, seeing how they perform in a real situation, I don't see any great drop off in performance compared to a highly optimised character. I think that optimisers tend to have a much higher standard for what is considered adequate compared to non-optimisers. When looking at theoretical situations and all bonuses, an optimiser can spot unoptimised discrepancies which appear really glaring. A non-optimiser may understand that if they built it a different way, they may get an extra +1 here or there. However, when it comes down to actually playing, I think the non-optimiser will notice bad die rolls more so that perhaps one fewer damage here or there. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Char-op Box
Top