Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Satin Knights" data-source="post: 6184159" data-attributes="member: 6666968">I was going to send this in a PM, but this deserves to be where you put it, in public.Seriously?&nbsp; Three people tried to help you.&nbsp; None of them had any ill intent or treated you as inferior.&nbsp; We gave you advice.&nbsp; You can take it or ignore it.&nbsp; Our policy is to have two approvals for first level characters.&nbsp; We are rushing the paperwork a bit an you were invited into a game before both of those approvals were done.&nbsp; That is fine, we have done it before.&nbsp; We start a new first level game about every two months.&nbsp; Instead of making you wait all that time, the GM is taking on an oversized group in order to squeeze you in.If you don't want to make the last two change suggestions, then a &quot;I am happy skipping those advantages.&quot; would clear the last thing that we see as a hold up on the approval and the character would be stamped as approved.&nbsp;&nbsp; Non-optimal is fine and dandy.&nbsp; I have a cleric that can't read.&nbsp; It makes things a little more interesting.&nbsp; We just didn't want to have a oversight be the cause of something non-optimal that you might regret later.So, if my post offended you, it was not its intention.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Satin Knights, post: 6184159, member: 6666968"] I was going to send this in a PM, but this deserves to be where you put it, in public. Seriously? Three people tried to help you. None of them had any ill intent or treated you as inferior. We gave you advice. You can take it or ignore it. Our policy is to have two approvals for first level characters. We are rushing the paperwork a bit an you were invited into a game before both of those approvals were done. That is fine, we have done it before. We start a new first level game about every two months. Instead of making you wait all that time, the GM is taking on an oversized group in order to squeeze you in. If you don't want to make the last two change suggestions, then a "I am happy skipping those advantages." would clear the last thing that we see as a hold up on the approval and the character would be stamped as approved. Non-optimal is fine and dandy. I have a cleric that can't read. It makes things a little more interesting. We just didn't want to have a oversight be the cause of something non-optimal that you might regret later. So, if my post offended you, it was not its intention. [/QUOTE]

Verification