BrooklynKnight said:Point is, a voice can be a powerfull thing. And if used intelligently and well it can sway other vote holders.
This is why in the modern buisness world boards of directors try as hard as possible to AVOID general votes on issues because they know how much power the voting stockholder can hold, and they fear it.
Unfortunately, the truth is that the vast majority of the shares (and, thus, the votes) for most companies are held by institutional investors and / or company insiders. Even if you *were* to try a grassroots movement to affect a vote, unless you got some of those holders of large numbers of shares to agree with you, it wouldn't have much of an effect, I fear.
And, about the only thing that seems to get the attention of a signifcant percentage of votes is something that either (a) is going to materially affect the value of the stock, or (b) is a significant moral or ethical issue (e.g., when stockholders forced companies to not invest in South Africa during the 1980s).