"Charlie's Angels" vs zombies

Charlie's Angel: Full Throttle? I'll watch it. Knowing beforehand what it is, I still enjoy that kind of entertainment. And they should stick to their signature schtick.

Besides, I have a thing for Demi Moore. :D

I may watch 28 Days Later but horror is not my personal preference.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

If you're looking for a movie that doesn't insult your intelligence, then 28 Days Later is hardly the film for you.

The characters CONSTANTLY do the stupid thing but get away unscathed because the writer needed to add some more "jump out of your seat" zombies.
 

DWARF said:
If you're looking for a movie that doesn't insult your intelligence, then 28 Days Later is hardly the film for you.

The characters CONSTANTLY do the stupid thing but get away unscathed because the writer needed to add some more "jump out of your seat" zombies.

:mad:

Oh well. That's $6 I get to save then.
 

kengar said:
But I think I need to get my butt out to see X2 or Matrix Reloaded first. :)

If you see Charlie's Angels before you see either X2 or The Matrix: Reloaded, you might as well cut your manhood off and throw it out a car window.

I'd like to see 28 Days Later, but I have to admit, Lucy is hot.
 

DWARF said:
If you're looking for a movie that doesn't insult your intelligence, then 28 Days Later is hardly the film for you.

The characters CONSTANTLY do the stupid thing but get away unscathed because the writer needed to add some more "jump out of your seat" zombies.

Sounds like Jeepers Creepers.

That movie played out like a documentory of the two stupidest people on the planet.

Bad guy was creepy though.
 


Unless you're not a fan of horror, Piratecat. :eek:

And yes, Ashrem Bayle, I did watched X2 and eat fatty red meat so I can safely watch CA:FT in a "Macho Manly Gamer Geek" fashion. :cool:

Besides, I uttered the word "cute dice" among my Macho Manly Gamer Geek friends. :(
 

28 Days because I love a good horror movie and when CA came out without any guns to make a political statement, I decided I would make a personal decision not to see it. So far my life is not any worse for ware. TV and movies are for entertainment, why can't actors collect their millions of $$$ and shut their traps.
 
Last edited:

KnowTheToe said:
...when CA came out without any guns to make a political statement...

I don't think it had anything to do with making a political statement. There were plenty of guns in the first movie, but the Angels don't use them. And that makes perfect sense, given the tone of the movie. You can't have a fun, light-hearted movie where the heroes run around shooting people.
 

Chun-tzu said:


I don't think it had anything to do with making a political statement. There were plenty of guns in the first movie, but the Angels don't use them. And that makes perfect sense, given the tone of the movie. You can't have a fun, light-hearted movie where the heroes run around shooting people.

Although I'm sure someone will try it at some point...

Yeah, there were an awful lot of guns in there. Swiss cheese has nothing on one scene, to memory. I shudder to think of the sheer number of bullets required to do that to a trailer...

I'll probably catch Full Throttle when it reaches New Zealand, because the first one was fun and had some rather unusual meta humour. Haven't seen anything to do with 28 Days Later yet, so don't know if I'll interrupt my busy schedule of sitting around at home and go see it or not.
 

Remove ads

Top