Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="CajunAzn" data-source="post: 5077314" data-attributes="member: 87718">First let me say, it seems like now we debating in the realm of RAI. So I'm going to assume you believe my proposal is legal, just not what you think RAI, correct?&nbsp;If thats the case, then let's carry on the RAI debate:&nbsp;&nbsp;That's why, after considering your guys' well thought out responses, I added the factor terrain concealment/cover. Are you not prepared to accept, that even for a moment, you could be covered enough by an allow to slip into a bush/shadow? &nbsp;&nbsp;As I said before, what you consider to be a loophole, other may consider to be by-design. I don't think that using your ally as momentary cover to slip into a spot of camoflauge/shadow is that far-fetched at all. But I am not going to tell you what you want to house-rule at your own table. But for my own table, I can see it adding to the depth and fun of the game (while remaining within the RAW). &nbsp;===&nbsp;And thank you for your input, Draco. I respect all of your comments because, in the very least, they have allowed a definite conclusion on the RAW, while giving wider perspective on the RAI. &nbsp;Btw, thank you also for expanding my vocabulary on each of your posts <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="CajunAzn, post: 5077314, member: 87718"] First let me say, it seems like now we debating in the realm of RAI. So I'm going to assume you believe my proposal is legal, just not what you think RAI, correct? If thats the case, then let's carry on the RAI debate: That's why, after considering your guys' well thought out responses, I added the factor terrain concealment/cover. Are you not prepared to accept, that [I]even for a moment[/I], you could be covered enough by an allow to slip into a bush/shadow? As I said before, what you consider to be a loophole, other may consider to be by-design. I don't think that using your ally as momentary cover to slip into a spot of camoflauge/shadow is that far-fetched at all. But I am not going to tell you what you want to house-rule at your own table. But for my own table, I can see it adding to the depth and fun of the game (while remaining within the RAW). === And thank you for your input, Draco. I respect all of your comments because, in the very least, they have allowed a definite conclusion on the RAW, while giving wider perspective on the RAI. Btw, thank you also for expanding my vocabulary on each of your posts :) [/QUOTE]

Verification