Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Class Compendium Official Announcement
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FabioMilitoPagliara" data-source="post: 5356977" data-attributes="member: 10313"><p>I don't think so</p><p>in 3.5 they said this is the new ranger, the old is not more usable</p><p>in Essential they say this is a new sub-class/build of the ranger, the old one can go hand in hand with this new one</p><p></p><p>well they tied in the game shop with interview we don't have real data</p><p>and pathfinder is actually 3.5 so has a pretty solid base by itself</p><p></p><p>sorry for them they are missing a lot of new options</p><p></p><p>adding new classes don't change the game, never have, never will</p><p></p><p>or it's telling that they have a different way to present the game, a way that is made of box and other things that can be sold primarly in shops instead that just by dowloading an update</p><p></p><p>and the real point is to have this 10 products always in the shop so that if you want to start playing D&D in october 2011 you will just get the redbox and try it out 20$, instead of buying 3 big books, dices, an adventure and a lot of other things</p><p></p><p>for various reason</p><p>1) ESSENTIAL and CORE are both 4th edition so they are just selling in two differen formats</p><p>2) there are many reason to not support all editions at once (copyright just to say one)</p><p>3) I think they wantend also to separate OGL from D&D</p><p></p><p>oh yeah they must be really stupid....</p><p>or maybe who still play 1st edition has all the books he needs....</p><p></p><p>or maybe you must just have a different point of view than yours</p><p>they could not have done the pathfinder route</p><p>1) as said to separate D&D from OGL</p><p>2) to call for massive beta testing would have cut at least 1 year off 3.5</p><p>3) it would have aimed to people already buying 3.5 who was dwindling steadly...</p><p></p><p>maybe I am not sensible, but to compare D&D and Pathfinder you should just pile up the number of manuals of both the total sale figure of the 2 brands and the number of subscribers to D&D Insider</p><p></p><p>your problem</p><p></p><p></p><p>maybe TSR before 1985.... but after that it was a big mess <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f641.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":(" title="Frown :(" data-smilie="3"data-shortname=":(" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FabioMilitoPagliara, post: 5356977, member: 10313"] I don't think so in 3.5 they said this is the new ranger, the old is not more usable in Essential they say this is a new sub-class/build of the ranger, the old one can go hand in hand with this new one well they tied in the game shop with interview we don't have real data and pathfinder is actually 3.5 so has a pretty solid base by itself sorry for them they are missing a lot of new options adding new classes don't change the game, never have, never will or it's telling that they have a different way to present the game, a way that is made of box and other things that can be sold primarly in shops instead that just by dowloading an update and the real point is to have this 10 products always in the shop so that if you want to start playing D&D in october 2011 you will just get the redbox and try it out 20$, instead of buying 3 big books, dices, an adventure and a lot of other things for various reason 1) ESSENTIAL and CORE are both 4th edition so they are just selling in two differen formats 2) there are many reason to not support all editions at once (copyright just to say one) 3) I think they wantend also to separate OGL from D&D oh yeah they must be really stupid.... or maybe who still play 1st edition has all the books he needs.... or maybe you must just have a different point of view than yours they could not have done the pathfinder route 1) as said to separate D&D from OGL 2) to call for massive beta testing would have cut at least 1 year off 3.5 3) it would have aimed to people already buying 3.5 who was dwindling steadly... maybe I am not sensible, but to compare D&D and Pathfinder you should just pile up the number of manuals of both the total sale figure of the 2 brands and the number of subscribers to D&D Insider your problem maybe TSR before 1985.... but after that it was a big mess :( [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Class Compendium Official Announcement
Top