Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mighty Veil" data-source="post: 3711557" data-attributes="member: 30559">Should be interesting to see what they give us for classes. That's a big thing that I find directly gives each edition its feel.I would rather they drop PrCs. If kept, then they'd be a 5 levels type class. The class tree idea, like in SWSE, could be neat. Yes within a month there will be 1000 new tree classes out there thanks to Dragon online and D20 publishers.Which classes would I like to see. I have to ask that to myself. Not sure really. Not yet.I would like more archtype feel. Monk and Bard would be a type of traveler class. Not from around here type of deal. Not the anime warrior and lute playing idiot.I like the idea of cleric over priest. Paladin its own class, though I'd like a return to its roots. Let the cleric be the holy warrior, crusader, the adventuring priest (Friar Tuck), holy mage and prophet (Moses) again. Paladin is a hero. And in medieval fantasy, that means a knight. I think I'd like to see a paladin be built more for fighting the big monsters, like dragons, devils, liches. I've never been a druid guy. But I would expect lots of people being upset to see it become a tree class of cleric.Keep barbarian, fighter, ranger, rogue (or thief even). I do miss the assassin.&nbsp; Keep wizard and call it wizard. It would be a perfect class for specialist wizards. I would like to see them DO AWAY with the 8 schools and just have &quot;x&quot; number of tree for all the popular archtypes, like an enchanter (beguiler), necromancer, warlock. Not sure why a sorcerer might be needed if they update the magic system, but I suppose one of the two arcane would have tougher magic while the other has many more lesser magics.I like the marshal from MHB. Add me in hoping the warlord is the next generation of it.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mighty Veil, post: 3711557, member: 30559"] Should be interesting to see what they give us for classes. That's a big thing that I find directly gives each edition its feel. I would rather they drop PrCs. If kept, then they'd be a 5 levels type class. The class tree idea, like in SWSE, could be neat. Yes within a month there will be 1000 new tree classes out there thanks to Dragon online and D20 publishers. Which classes would I like to see. I have to ask that to myself. Not sure really. Not yet. I would like more archtype feel. Monk and Bard would be a type of traveler class. Not from around here type of deal. Not the anime warrior and lute playing idiot. I like the idea of cleric over priest. Paladin its own class, though I'd like a return to its roots. Let the cleric be the holy warrior, crusader, the adventuring priest (Friar Tuck), holy mage and prophet (Moses) again. Paladin is a hero. And in medieval fantasy, that means a knight. I think I'd like to see a paladin be built more for fighting the big monsters, like dragons, devils, liches. I've never been a druid guy. But I would expect lots of people being upset to see it become a tree class of cleric. Keep barbarian, fighter, ranger, rogue (or thief even). I do miss the assassin. Keep wizard and call it wizard. It would be a perfect class for specialist wizards. I would like to see them DO AWAY with the 8 schools and just have "x" number of tree for all the popular archtypes, like an enchanter (beguiler), necromancer, warlock. Not sure why a sorcerer might be needed if they update the magic system, but I suppose one of the two arcane would have tougher magic while the other has many more lesser magics. I like the marshal from MHB. Add me in hoping the warlord is the next generation of it. [/QUOTE]

Verification