Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is LIVE! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Classes you're hoping WotC will create
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jester David" data-source="post: 6567171" data-attributes="member: 37579"><p>I personally view the issue as less "it wasn't in D&D before" as "it makes the game more complicated and the worlds more crowded". In the same way adding four or five brand new humanoid races is problematic for campaign settings and adds more options bogging down character creation. Suddenly you're explaining how shapechanger wilden fit into Eberron. </p><p>Some of the existing classes could probably go bye-bye as well (barbarian, ranger, paladin, and sorcerer) but survive due to tradition. Newer options don't have that same history, the "well, it was in four other versions of the game..." impetus to keep it around. </p><p></p><p>Yeah, it's easy to say "well, don't permit that option in your game." But then WotC is creating content they expect a large number of people to ignore. Making ignorable options is fine for a DM book with rules options (especially ones that only take a page or two) and have far more limited testing. Classes should be playtested out the wazoo at multiple levels, making them very work intensive. </p><p>Classes take a lot of work to make, so it shouldn't be done unless there's an expected high usage. In the 5-pages a new class occupies, we could have a like 10 new subclasses.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jester David, post: 6567171, member: 37579"] I personally view the issue as less "it wasn't in D&D before" as "it makes the game more complicated and the worlds more crowded". In the same way adding four or five brand new humanoid races is problematic for campaign settings and adds more options bogging down character creation. Suddenly you're explaining how shapechanger wilden fit into Eberron. Some of the existing classes could probably go bye-bye as well (barbarian, ranger, paladin, and sorcerer) but survive due to tradition. Newer options don't have that same history, the "well, it was in four other versions of the game..." impetus to keep it around. Yeah, it's easy to say "well, don't permit that option in your game." But then WotC is creating content they expect a large number of people to ignore. Making ignorable options is fine for a DM book with rules options (especially ones that only take a page or two) and have far more limited testing. Classes should be playtested out the wazoo at multiple levels, making them very work intensive. Classes take a lot of work to make, so it shouldn't be done unless there's an expected high usage. In the 5-pages a new class occupies, we could have a like 10 new subclasses. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Classes you're hoping WotC will create
Top