Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Felon" data-source="post: 1348265" data-attributes="member: 8158">When I think of old Dragon articles, a lot of truly outrageous stuff comes to mind, like OTT character classes that had 4 or 5 pages worth of class features. Anyone else remember the ninja or the jester? Those authors didn't think for a second that they should be trimmed down to resemble something reasonable. But then again, why should they have? Everyone knew they were strictly for NPC's only.....Riiiiight!&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> Probably the one article that I always wanted to dig up was from back in 1989. It was an article on little-known 0-level spells, like &quot;Find Earth&quot; (which causes the caster to immediately fall down face-first and take 1d4 points of damage) and &quot;Fiery Breath&quot; (with a material component consisting of jalapeno pepper). They were pretty hilarious. Wish I could remember them all.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Felon, post: 1348265, member: 8158"] When I think of old [I]Dragon[/I] articles, a lot of truly outrageous stuff comes to mind, like OTT character classes that had 4 or 5 pages worth of class features. Anyone else remember the ninja or the jester? Those authors didn't think for a second that they should be trimmed down to resemble something reasonable. But then again, why should they have? Everyone knew they were strictly for NPC's only..... Riiiiight! ;) Probably the one article that I always wanted to dig up was from back in 1989. It was an article on little-known 0-level spells, like "Find Earth" (which causes the caster to immediately fall down face-first and take 1d4 points of damage) and "Fiery Breath" (with a material component consisting of jalapeno pepper). They were pretty hilarious. Wish I could remember them all. [/QUOTE]

Verification