College Football 2006

[Dungannon]

Right now I'd say the Big East is a better conference than the ACC, and I thought I'd never say that after the realignment a couple of years ago.

 

[Crothian]

Right now I'd say the Big East is a better conference than the ACC, and I thought I'd never say that after the realignment a couple of years ago.

I agree and it's damned funny!!

 

[drothgery]

Right now I'd say the Big East is a better conference than the ACC, and I thought I'd never say that after the realignment a couple of years ago.

As a shameless fan of a Big East school (admittedly one that was almost part of said realignment), I'd say the current state of the ACC couldn't happen to a better conference

 

[Crothian]

This Auburn Florida game is great!!

 

[drothgery]

This Auburn Florida game is great!!

Well, if you assume that USC will eventually get burned eventually, given all the times they've been playing close games in the fourth quarter, then it looks like we'll see OSU/Michigan winner vs. WVU/L'ville winner for the BCS title. Of course, it's just as likely that USC comes out of their bye week with everyone healthy and starts beating people by three or four touchdowns again, or even pulls a 2002 Ohio State and keeps winning close games for no logical reason (the only reason why this sometimes works in football is because the season's pretty short, so sometimes there's not enough time for luck to even out).

 

[Crothian]

Ya, I agree. It will be USC's to loose. I think an undefeated Big Ten and PAC ten winners will go ahead of an undefeated Big East team. USC of course has some of their toughest games haead of them and of these five have the toughest road IMO.

 

[drothgery]

I think an undefeated Big Ten and Pac 10 winners will go ahead of an undefeated Big East team.

And I can deal with that (though if I still lived in upstate NY, rather than out here in Pac 10 country, I might not be so forgiving). I just don't want any one-loss teams sneaking ahead of an undefeated L'ville/WVU winner, and for the BCS to give them a shot at whoever's #4.

 

[Crothian]

What would really be interesting though highly doubtful is Rutgers to go undefeated with a one loss USC team and see if Rutgers gets jumped by a once lose team. I'm assuming OSU or Mich win out.

 

[drothgery]

What would really be interesting though highly doubtful is Rutgers to go undefeated with a one loss USC team and see if Rutgers gets jumped by a once lose team. I'm assuming OSU or Mich win out.

In the unlikely event Rutgers goes undefeated, they'd've beaten two top-ten teams (in WVU and L'ville). If they're one of the last two BCS unbeatens, they really shouldn't get jumped.

 

[Dimwhit]

Ya, I agree. It will be USC's to loose. I think an undefeated Big Ten and PAC ten winners will go ahead of an undefeated Big East team. USC of course has some of their toughest games haead of them and of these five have the toughest road IMO.

Which is why I think USC would deserve it. If they can go undefeated, even winning close games, they should probably go to the title game. They've got some tough games coming up.