Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Primitive Screwhead" data-source="post: 2797994" data-attributes="member: 20805">Thats much better...Essentially each attack sequence consists of:Phase 1.&nbsp; Attacker Move and Strike, DC set by difficulty of the strike.&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; Success grants damage dice for phase 2.&nbsp; Defender 'reads' opponent, DC set by Attackers strike roll.&nbsp; Defender Blocks, DC set by difficult of the block..&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; Success grants damage dice for phase 2Phase 2.&nbsp; defenders damage roll negates portions or all of attackers damage roll. Any remainder is applied to the defender.I think this method does emulate the more give and take of combat, but two main issues:Time. 3.x combat it amazing time consuming as written, this version expands each strike into a full rounds worth of actions on its own.Ripple effects.... how does this impact other rules such as:- Armor&nbsp; (does it provide 'soak', how does it hinder defense.. )- Charging (special attack routines maybe? )- TrapsDo you have some of these already figured out?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Primitive Screwhead, post: 2797994, member: 20805"] Thats much better... Essentially each attack sequence consists of: Phase 1 . Attacker Move and Strike, DC set by difficulty of the strike . Success grants damage dice for phase 2 . Defender 'reads' opponent, DC set by Attackers strike roll . Defender Blocks, DC set by difficult of the block. . Success grants damage dice for phase 2 Phase 2 . defenders damage roll negates portions or all of attackers damage roll. Any remainder is applied to the defender. I think this method does emulate the more give and take of combat, but two main issues: Time. 3.x combat it amazing time consuming as written, this version expands each strike into a full rounds worth of actions on its own. Ripple effects.... how does this impact other rules such as: - Armor (does it provide 'soak', how does it hinder defense.. ) - Charging (special attack routines maybe? ) - Traps Do you have some of these already figured out? [/QUOTE]

Verification