Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Conceptual Problem - Fighter vs. Ranger
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="El Mahdi" data-source="post: 5823574" data-attributes="member: 59506"><p>I think it's important to look at these classes from what their backgrounds likely are. Though there may be some disagreement abou this, I see them this way:</p><p> </p><p><strong><u>Warrior</u></strong>: A Warrior with a <em>military </em>background of at least an infantry soldier. Understands military force structure, defences, and tactics, as well as being versed in the most common fighting forms of the time.</p><p> </p><p><strong><u>Knight</u></strong>: A Noble Warrior, with much the same combat skills as the above warrior, but concentrates much more on Equestrian combat. Command skills can be common to both the Knight and Warrior. The symbol of a Knight is not their sword or armor, but their spurs.</p><p> </p><p><strong><u>Paladin</u></strong>: A Mendicant Knight. A Knight that has taken vows of poverty, piety, and yes...chastity, in the service of a god. They have a special connection to their deity and gain special favor for their sacrifice.</p><p> </p><p><strong><u>Fighter</u></strong>: A warrior without a military background. Combat skills learned from Sword/Fencing teachers. Professional Duelists, Body Guards, and even some Mercenaries fall into this category.</p><p> </p><p><strong><u>Monk</u></strong>: an oriental warrior dedicated to both mind and body perfection. They have skills in common with military warriors, but are at the same time much less and much more than a straight warrior. They are not historically, a warrior that focuses exclusively on unarmed combat. Such focus has only been during specific historical periods and always as a result of the political climate of the time.</p><p> </p><p><strong><u>Ranger</u></strong>: A Woodsman. Can fight much like a Fighter but is most at home in the wilderness. Their skills are tracking, hunting, and scouting. They may be part of a military group but only as a scout - not as a Warrior on the battlefield.</p><p> </p><p><strong><u>Barbarian (Berserker)</u></strong>: A unique Warrior of Germanic (Barbarian) origin. Outlawed in many places and times. They escue the use of armor (except for Hides, such as Bear or Wolf hides), and work themself into a rage (either by psychological means or through the use of "herbal" agents).</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>I would really like to see the classes get back closer to their roots and original inspirations, rather than continuing in the direction they have been going. A direction that has strayed far from their origins.</p><p> </p><p><img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/glasses.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt="B-)" title="Glasses B-)" data-shortname="B-)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="El Mahdi, post: 5823574, member: 59506"] I think it's important to look at these classes from what their backgrounds likely are. Though there may be some disagreement abou this, I see them this way: [B][U]Warrior[/U][/B]: A Warrior with a [I]military [/I]background of at least an infantry soldier. Understands military force structure, defences, and tactics, as well as being versed in the most common fighting forms of the time. [B][U]Knight[/U][/B]: A Noble Warrior, with much the same combat skills as the above warrior, but concentrates much more on Equestrian combat. Command skills can be common to both the Knight and Warrior. The symbol of a Knight is not their sword or armor, but their spurs. [B][U]Paladin[/U][/B]: A Mendicant Knight. A Knight that has taken vows of poverty, piety, and yes...chastity, in the service of a god. They have a special connection to their deity and gain special favor for their sacrifice. [B][U]Fighter[/U][/B]: A warrior without a military background. Combat skills learned from Sword/Fencing teachers. Professional Duelists, Body Guards, and even some Mercenaries fall into this category. [B][U]Monk[/U][/B]: an oriental warrior dedicated to both mind and body perfection. They have skills in common with military warriors, but are at the same time much less and much more than a straight warrior. They are not historically, a warrior that focuses exclusively on unarmed combat. Such focus has only been during specific historical periods and always as a result of the political climate of the time. [B][U]Ranger[/U][/B]: A Woodsman. Can fight much like a Fighter but is most at home in the wilderness. Their skills are tracking, hunting, and scouting. They may be part of a military group but only as a scout - not as a Warrior on the battlefield. [B][U]Barbarian (Berserker)[/U][/B]: A unique Warrior of Germanic (Barbarian) origin. Outlawed in many places and times. They escue the use of armor (except for Hides, such as Bear or Wolf hides), and work themself into a rage (either by psychological means or through the use of "herbal" agents). I would really like to see the classes get back closer to their roots and original inspirations, rather than continuing in the direction they have been going. A direction that has strayed far from their origins. B-) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Conceptual Problem - Fighter vs. Ranger
Top