Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Ranger REG" data-source="post: 856961" data-attributes="member: 533">I don't see nothing wrong with a class having a good BAB and an average HD. You may think that it would be more appealing when it comes to the other classes that have medium HD, especially a druid, but I think both classes will be distinctive enough and balanced with the rest.It has everything to do with D&amp;D ranger class, especially when it was inherited during the 2nd edition. Only this time around, the 3.5e ranger give you option, you can decide to stick with the &quot;classic&quot; ranger or go with a more &quot;archer&quot; ranger archetype.Besides, I doubt ranger fans would like to acquire TWF as a &quot;normal feat&quot; but rather as a &quot;bonus feat.&quot;Of which I agree with you. See one of my earlier posts.This &quot;Combat Paths&quot; sounds more like Talent Trees from d20 Modern. Personally, it is okay, depending how it is alloted by level. I hope that you are not restricted to choosing one combat path. I like a mixture of melee and ranged attack repertoire.I'm not sure what you're getting at. I mean personally, some fighting style are effective in wilderness situations, especially when one takes advantage of the terrain.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Ranger REG, post: 856961, member: 533"] I don't see nothing wrong with a class having a good BAB and an average HD. You may think that it would be more appealing when it comes to the other classes that have medium HD, especially a druid, but I think both classes will be distinctive enough and balanced with the rest. It has everything to do with [i]D&D[/i] ranger class, especially when it was inherited during the 2nd edition. Only this time around, the 3.5e ranger give you option, you can decide to stick with the "classic" ranger or go with a more "archer" ranger archetype. Besides, I doubt ranger fans would like to acquire TWF as a "normal feat" but rather as a "bonus feat." Of which I agree with you. See one of my earlier posts. This "Combat Paths" sounds more like Talent Trees from [i]d20 Modern.[/i] Personally, it is okay, depending how it is alloted by level. I hope that you are not restricted to choosing one combat path. I like a mixture of melee and ranged attack repertoire. I'm not sure what you're getting at. I mean personally, some fighting style are effective in wilderness situations, especially when one takes advantage of the terrain. [/QUOTE]

Verification