Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Confirmed - Rangers get d8 HD in 3.5e.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="boschdevil" data-source="post: 859776" data-attributes="member: 10221"><p>Well, I do admit that I used the 3rd edition point buy because I couldn't think of another system off-hand that one could use for attribute point equivalency. I only meant it as a tool to try to have equitable ability comparison for 1st edition ranger and fighter.</p><p></p><p>However, let me use one other item that has been around since the beginning of D&D and far before it - probability and statistics.</p><p></p><p>Let start with some terms with their descriptions:</p><p></p><p>minimum ranger: Abilities are 13 for strength and intelligence, 14 for wisdom and constitution, 8 for dexterity and charisma.</p><p></p><p>buff fighter: Abilities are 15 for strength, 18 for constitution, and 8 for dexterity, charisma, intelligence, and wisdom.</p><p></p><p>buff ranger: Abilities are 15 for strength, 18 for constitution, 13 for intelligence, 14 for wisdom, and 8 for dexterity and charisma.</p><p></p><p>Now, for first edition there was two methods for rolling attributes: roll 3d6 and roll 4d6 keep the 3 highest.</p><p></p><p>The following are the probabilities of rolling at least the attributes noted for the term using the rolling methods employed:</p><p></p><p>Roll 3d6:</p><p>Minimum ranger -> 1 in 64.18</p><p>Buff fighter -> 1 in 66.16</p><p>Buff ranger -> 1 in 199.66</p><p></p><p>Roll 4d6, keep highest 3:</p><p>Minimum ranger -> 1 in 15.98</p><p>Buff fighter -> 1 in 3.39</p><p>Buff ranger -> 1 in 26.93</p><p></p><p>So the moral of the story is though a buff ranger would be tougher than a buff fighter, the fighter is still tougher than the ranger because the probability of getting the abilities for a buff ranger is far less than getting the abilities of a buff fighter. In fact, the probability of getting the abilities for a buff fighter is around the same to better than being able to get the abilities required for a minimum fighter. And I didn't even include the fact that the buff fighter qualified for experience points bonus, while the rangers here in question did not.</p><p></p><p>If you want a copy the work for how I got my results, I can put it in Word format and send it to you. Just let me know.</p><p></p><p>Take care.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="boschdevil, post: 859776, member: 10221"] Well, I do admit that I used the 3rd edition point buy because I couldn't think of another system off-hand that one could use for attribute point equivalency. I only meant it as a tool to try to have equitable ability comparison for 1st edition ranger and fighter. However, let me use one other item that has been around since the beginning of D&D and far before it - probability and statistics. Let start with some terms with their descriptions: minimum ranger: Abilities are 13 for strength and intelligence, 14 for wisdom and constitution, 8 for dexterity and charisma. buff fighter: Abilities are 15 for strength, 18 for constitution, and 8 for dexterity, charisma, intelligence, and wisdom. buff ranger: Abilities are 15 for strength, 18 for constitution, 13 for intelligence, 14 for wisdom, and 8 for dexterity and charisma. Now, for first edition there was two methods for rolling attributes: roll 3d6 and roll 4d6 keep the 3 highest. The following are the probabilities of rolling at least the attributes noted for the term using the rolling methods employed: Roll 3d6: Minimum ranger -> 1 in 64.18 Buff fighter -> 1 in 66.16 Buff ranger -> 1 in 199.66 Roll 4d6, keep highest 3: Minimum ranger -> 1 in 15.98 Buff fighter -> 1 in 3.39 Buff ranger -> 1 in 26.93 So the moral of the story is though a buff ranger would be tougher than a buff fighter, the fighter is still tougher than the ranger because the probability of getting the abilities for a buff ranger is far less than getting the abilities of a buff fighter. In fact, the probability of getting the abilities for a buff fighter is around the same to better than being able to get the abilities required for a minimum fighter. And I didn't even include the fact that the buff fighter qualified for experience points bonus, while the rangers here in question did not. If you want a copy the work for how I got my results, I can put it in Word format and send it to you. Just let me know. Take care. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Confirmed - Rangers get d8 HD in 3.5e.
Top