Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Cleon" data-source="post: 6013139" data-attributes="member: 57383">I think you meant greater teleport. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />We can give it a bunch of utility SLAs for divination (e.g. greater arcane sight, analyze dweomer, true seeing, discern location, vision or legend lore, prying eyes or greater prying eyes, or maybe even foresight), plus counter-magic powers (like screen, nondetection, dimensional anchor and/or dimensional lock, greater dispel magic or even mage's disjunction). Those won't impact directly on its combat abilities that much, but will offer protection against some standard PC &quot;cheat codes&quot; and they fit a creature of &quot;eldritch secrets&quot;.I thought about adding globe of invulnerability, but I think its &quot;spell reflection&quot; ought to be enough, as we can give it an effectiveness boost over standard spell turning.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Cleon, post: 6013139, member: 57383"] I think you meant [I]greater teleport[/I]. :) We can give it a bunch of utility SLAs for divination (e.g. [I]greater arcane sight[/I], [I]analyze dweomer[/I], [I]true seeing[/I], [I]discern location[/I], [I]vision[/I] [COLOR=Red][B]or[/B][/COLOR] [I]legend lore[/I], [I]prying eyes[/I] [COLOR=Red][B]or[/B][/COLOR] [I]greater prying eyes[/I], or maybe even [I]foresight[/I]), plus counter-magic powers (like [I]screen[/I], [I]nondetection, [/I][I]dimensional anchor[/I] [COLOR=Red][B]and/or[/B][/COLOR] [I]dimensional lock[/I], [I]greater dispel magic[/I] or even [I]mage's disjunction).[/I] Those won't impact directly on its combat abilities that much, but will offer protection against some standard PC "cheat codes" and they fit a creature of "eldritch secrets". I thought about adding [I]globe of invulnerability[/I], but I think its "[I]spell reflection[/I]" ought to be enough, as we can give it an effectiveness boost over standard [I]spell turning[/I]. [/QUOTE]

Verification