Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Aspect of BOZ" data-source="post: 3408925" data-attributes="member: 41113">I’m just trying to keep it simple… it doesn’t necessarily have to make sense.  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />Part of the reason I want to give them all of them a uniform system of AC bonus is so that we don’t have to think about it every time, and discuss it, and come up with a separate idea for each one.  While, yes, it seems to make sense that there would be room for variation (and there is), we should at least establish a “base” sort of “this is what you get unless you have a good reason not to” sort of thing.  Be it a Wis-based insight bonus or Cha-based deflection bonus, or something like Unholy Aura, an SLA, or something else altogether, it would just make this whole process so much easier if we could rubber stamp it on each one.I could easily see a Cha-based deflection bonus for devils, since charming and seductive is often the rule of the day.I could perhaps even more easily see a Wis-based insight bonus for all.I would be willing to say that we could alternate between the two (just to keep the Dukes from being too locked into place), either giving the higher bonus or just the one that makes the most sense.  I mainly don't want to stick them with too-high, easily-overcome natural AC bonuses.For the AC bonus, I care less about what has been established for other lords, and more about what will make our job easier.  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

Verification