Roadkill101
Explorer
I'd have no problem playing in a, Core rules only, campaign as Quasqueton defined. And to echo Olgar Shiverstone, there's enough in the core books to run with for years.
Agreed completely. In fact, if a GM tried to tell me "I allow anything printed by WotC in their books or web enhancements, with no restrictions. There is nothing put out by WotC that can break your game" I would be briefly tempted to prove her wrong and then overcome the temptation and likely never game with her again (it would depend on if she was a fantastic GM *and* all the players were willing to play fair and self-censor themselves away from the broken things to which the GM was blind).Crothian said:Misunderstood what? There are things in the Wizards own books that can break the game.
Quasqueton said:Is Core Rules Only considered a "restriction"?
Absolutely. You yourself used the word in the first post. For me, the minimum level I would expect before I considered it to be shackling my creativity would be "Core Rules accepted without question (possibly with a few specific exceptions). Everything else you have to ask me on a case-by-case basis. I'll look over it and either accept it or give a well-thought-out reason why I don't accept it, of which 'I don't think I can judge the effect this will have on game balance, so I'm going to not allow it to be safe' is an acceptable response."Quasqueton said:Is Core Rules Only considered a "restriction"?
Quasqueton