Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Henadic Theologian" data-source="post: 9408275" data-attributes="member: 7030526">Planeswalker Guide 3[URL unfurl=&quot;true&quot;]https://magic.wizards.com/en/news/feature/planeswalkers-guide-to-bloomburrow-part-3[/URL]&nbsp;Apparently the other types of Animalfolk like Weaselfolk and Molefolk are just lower in population.&nbsp;And there is a mystery as to what is the source of the enchantment that turns&nbsp;It's not just that, the MtG side actually cares about it's that it actually cares about Canon &amp; metastory instead of seeing it as an inconvenience to be milked or ignored at their whims. Too much rule of cool (from their POV) and not enough respect for lore and consistent logical story telling with a living setting.&nbsp;&nbsp;The MtG's issue is not with world building, which they are great at.&nbsp; it's with world breaking, which they can do far too often. They should not be afraid of doing sets and stories with smaller, less cosmic focus, like the lBloomborrow story.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Henadic Theologian, post: 9408275, member: 7030526"] Planeswalker Guide 3 [URL unfurl="true"]https://magic.wizards.com/en/news/feature/planeswalkers-guide-to-bloomburrow-part-3[/URL] Apparently the other types of Animalfolk like Weaselfolk and Molefolk are just lower in population. And there is a mystery as to what is the source of the enchantment that turns It's not just that, the MtG side actually cares about it's that it actually cares about Canon & metastory instead of seeing it as an inconvenience to be milked or ignored at their whims. Too much rule of cool (from their POV) and not enough respect for lore and consistent logical story telling with a living setting. The MtG's issue is not with world building, which they are great at. it's with world breaking, which they can do far too often. They should not be afraid of doing sets and stories with smaller, less cosmic focus, like the lBloomborrow story. [/QUOTE]

Verification