UltimaGabe said:Now, I could be completely wrong, but I'm going to venture out on a limb and assume that the fighter in your group is NOT a 10x10 square of flesh (or it would be pretty hard for him to wear armor or wield weapons). Therefore, it's quite possible for a Fireball to be launched past him, especially considering that the world IS in fact 3-dimensional. The Wizard could have very easily just shot the fireball above the fighter to the back of the hall.
Unless the wizard happens to be Fine sized, but again, I could be wrong.
In short, your DM's full of crap.
UltimaGabe said:Now, I could be completely wrong, but I'm going to venture out on a limb and assume that the fighter in your group is NOT a 10x10 square of flesh (or it would be pretty hard for him to wear armor or wield weapons). Therefore, it's quite possible for a Fireball to be launched past him, especially considering that the world IS in fact 3-dimensional. The Wizard could have very easily just shot the fireball above the fighter to the back of the hall.
Unless the wizard happens to be Fine sized, but again, I could be wrong.
In short, your DM's full of crap.
Tatsukun said:Hi all, we were happily pounding through bad guys in our game today and our DM laid a big ruling on us. He says that a Fire Ball needs a clear line of effect, so no cover.
In the game, this took the form of the mage not being able to put a fireball on the other side of our fighter, as he provided cover. Here’s the layout…
It’s a 10’ wide hallway, with the fighter and against the south wall. To the east of the fighter are three (also medium size) monsters.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
..................................................(Monster 1)...(Monster 2)...[A]
(Mage).............................(Fighter)...............(Monster 3)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The big plan was to put the fireball just behind monster 2 (in the location marked as ‘A’) and thus cook all the monsters but not the fighter, but the DM ruled that that area was out of sight (total cover).
Our fighter is tough, so he agreed to ‘take one for the team’ and have the FB placed directly east of him (location ‘B’).
The DM ruled that any cover, including the fighter in this situation meant that the mage couldn’t put the FB there.
This has dire repercussions for putting fireballs in the second, third, or even middle rank of large groups of monsters.
So, to make a long story short, is he right?
-Tatsu
This is my metagame rationalization for why soft cover works as it does. Most charaters are not wide enough to take up their whole space. Thus Medium characters are not 5ft wide even though their space is. This means that a significant portion of a character's space is not physically occupied by the character thus allowing for "gaps" many of which should be at least 1 foot square.Ninja-to said:Anyway I now realize that 'soft cover' doesn't block line of effect, even though I still can't imagine where that 1 foot square is... :\
Scion said:Maybe I am just not understanding, but I cant fathom there not being 'several' 1 foot squares abounding all over. One character is in a 5' square, and another character is in a different 5' square adjacent. For two human sized characters there is just a 'huge' amount of extra room all over the place. Even taking into account armor, and cloaks, and other sorts of strangeness the mage could simply raise his hand and fire over the head of the character in front of him, or just give a little hopand that is a worst case scenario.
Ninja-to said:The way I was thinking was like this. If you're standing behind someone, even five feet behind them, and you're aiming your sniper rifle at someone (who is about the same size as the character right in front of you, but 30 feet away) then wouldn't that affect your aim? Isn't there still a 'chance' that you could hit that person?