Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Danceofmasks" data-source="post: 4620250" data-attributes="member: 70765">Huh?Having multiple arcanists made the best teams in 3e.My LG team often consisted of 4+ arcanists (usually 3+ sorcs), and it was made of win.Best game ever had 4 sorcs (full caster PrC), 1 wiz (full caster PrC), 1 wiz (arcane trickster).With divination spells, timely pre-buffing, me tanking (I had 141 hp &amp; 11-20 temp hp) and some ridiculous DPS (err, I mean damage per round) ...Multiple teleport and/or dimension door capable characters = win.&nbsp;But .. back on topic.In 4e, some characters are simply better suited for ever-changing party composition than others.Battle cleric? Yes please. Even if the party = 3 other leaders, it's a win.Sword &amp; board fighter? Can work well with just about anyone.&nbsp;Of course, there are weird circumstances that will prove troublesome.Being heavily armoured and finding yourself in a party of move 7 elves that like to kite could prove very painful.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Danceofmasks, post: 4620250, member: 70765"] Huh? Having multiple arcanists made the best teams in 3e. My LG team often consisted of 4+ arcanists (usually 3+ sorcs), and it was made of win. Best game ever had 4 sorcs (full caster PrC), 1 wiz (full caster PrC), 1 wiz (arcane trickster). With divination spells, timely pre-buffing, me tanking (I had 141 hp & 11-20 temp hp) and some ridiculous DPS (err, I mean damage per round) ... Multiple teleport and/or dimension door capable characters = win. But .. back on topic. In 4e, some characters are simply better suited for ever-changing party composition than others. Battle cleric? Yes please. Even if the party = 3 other leaders, it's a win. Sword & board fighter? Can work well with just about anyone. Of course, there are weird circumstances that will prove troublesome. Being heavily armoured and finding yourself in a party of move 7 elves that like to kite could prove very painful. [/QUOTE]

Verification