Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Critical Role show kickstarter update: Backers have to get Amazon prime to get the show
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jgsugden" data-source="post: 8518296" data-attributes="member: 2629"><p>There is a difference between justice/legal rights and the legal concept of equity. What is just may not be equitable, and what is equitable may require more than what is just. </p><p></p><p>Here, they asked people to help them create an animated special, that through the quality and quantity of support provided grew toi a season, which then (after being picked up by Amazon) was expanded to two seasons. The original vision grew and they adapted on the fly, resulting in a less organized final result than was possible. </p><p></p><p>Critical Role has met every obligation they promised in the KS, and thus have seen this to a just end. They did what was contractually required.</p><p></p><p>However, equity (and equity does not just mean equal - we're talking about the legal concept where we address situations where the letter of the law is unfair) doesn't seem to have been addressed here adequately to prevent people feeling 'ripped off'. We've historically had 'Courts of Equity' in Western Cultures that said, "I know what the letter of the law says, but that is unfair because of things not contemplated - do better.' They usually didn't provide money damages to people - they instead required actions that fixed the problem. They would have been seen better if they'd found a way for every backer of a certain level or above to be able to see it. Given their relationship with Twitch and Amazon, something should have been possible. </p><p></p><p>There are less than 90,000 backers. 65% of all Amazon users have Prime, and I'd tend to guess that most of the people that hand funds to throw here buy things on Amazon, and a disproportionate number of them (but certianly not all) have Prime. If they polled the people without Ptime, I'm guessing it would be 20K people, but that could be off. Amazon could have given them a bonus month of Prime Membership (on top of the normal free trial period you can get) to cover the first season (which was all that was supported/discussed by the KS), or they could have done a Subscription Only Twitch channel for it and gi ven free Subscription to it to the Backers, with add suppoort that compensated Amazon perhaps, and charged a huge amount to non-backers to be on it (also going to Amazon, perhaps). They could have done better.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jgsugden, post: 8518296, member: 2629"] There is a difference between justice/legal rights and the legal concept of equity. What is just may not be equitable, and what is equitable may require more than what is just. Here, they asked people to help them create an animated special, that through the quality and quantity of support provided grew toi a season, which then (after being picked up by Amazon) was expanded to two seasons. The original vision grew and they adapted on the fly, resulting in a less organized final result than was possible. Critical Role has met every obligation they promised in the KS, and thus have seen this to a just end. They did what was contractually required. However, equity (and equity does not just mean equal - we're talking about the legal concept where we address situations where the letter of the law is unfair) doesn't seem to have been addressed here adequately to prevent people feeling 'ripped off'. We've historically had 'Courts of Equity' in Western Cultures that said, "I know what the letter of the law says, but that is unfair because of things not contemplated - do better.' They usually didn't provide money damages to people - they instead required actions that fixed the problem. They would have been seen better if they'd found a way for every backer of a certain level or above to be able to see it. Given their relationship with Twitch and Amazon, something should have been possible. There are less than 90,000 backers. 65% of all Amazon users have Prime, and I'd tend to guess that most of the people that hand funds to throw here buy things on Amazon, and a disproportionate number of them (but certianly not all) have Prime. If they polled the people without Ptime, I'm guessing it would be 20K people, but that could be off. Amazon could have given them a bonus month of Prime Membership (on top of the normal free trial period you can get) to cover the first season (which was all that was supported/discussed by the KS), or they could have done a Subscription Only Twitch channel for it and gi ven free Subscription to it to the Backers, with add suppoort that compensated Amazon perhaps, and charged a huge amount to non-backers to be on it (also going to Amazon, perhaps). They could have done better. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Critical Role show kickstarter update: Backers have to get Amazon prime to get the show
Top