I too thought that I understood sots' post back when I read it, but amid all the "can you explain" and "no go reread it" I don't care if I did and hope that people can go back to griping about 5e's rough edges rather than arguing about sots'
who's post do you think was misunderstood just to be clear?I too thought that I understood sots' post back when I read it, but amid all the "can you explain" and "no go reread it" I don't care if I did and hope that people can go back to griping about 5e's rough edges rather than arguing about sots'
I think he's just confusing me and you for some reason. No doubt, we both need to post more clearly in order to prevent that.who's post do you think was misunderstood just to be clear?
we were talking about people misunderstanding don's posts.
errrr...no. that doesn't seem reasonably possible.I think he's just confusing me and you for some reason. No doubt, we both need to post more clearly in order to prevent that.
Except that I said what @dnd4vr said about your idea and you agreed with him, so I have no idea what you think was misrepresented. Was it the dice pool comparision?Well duh!
You have successfully refuted your own determined misreading.
That was a nice display of intuition, then. I was less nimble and so asked a question, for which I have been treated less than pleasantly. Even when I summarized I was dismissed, despite my understanding being the same as a later, lauded summary from a different poster, if much less verbose (a trait I've been told is antithetical to understanding, oddly). I suppose that may be because I also registered some disagreement with my summary though.For the record, I understood what he was talking about.
Fair enough and I liked XGtEI'd suggest checking out Xanathar's Guide to Everything in case you haven't. It's PHB2, but not called that because market research shows that names like "PHB2" drive people away.