Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
Archive Forums
Hosted Forums
Interactive Story Roleplaying (ISRP)
ISRP General Chit Chat
Crt
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fenmarel" data-source="post: 2559923"><p>To answer the question about trying to forbid or make it harder for certain races.....</p><p></p><p>In a way I wouldn't mind one bit if they were but that wasn't the main point of the original post but a way of showing examples later.</p><p></p><p>I started back in the AOL days myself after I completed my tour in the Marine Corps. I remember that there used to be a disclosure saying you had to be at least 13 to come to the chat site and if you weren't and found out later you would be banned. I happen to remember that several of the players actually did try to get the setting changed to Krynn though a very unsuccessful and short lived attempt. I don't think that if someone has been around from the beginning or just a few months has any bearing what so ever on the discussion at hand. Yes us "old fogies" have seen alot more than the newer players but throwing around time on site as a way to make it seem as an opinion must be right is the wrong way to go. That is why I don't do it though some would say I have every right to do so. I didn't mean that last bit as a flame of any kind to any single person so please only take it as the advice I was offering it as.</p><p></p><p>I sincerely believe that if any OFFICIAL setting is used then the rules of the setting should be enforced. We might have a form of FFRP here BUT when one of the rooms is D&D setting with set rules they should be followed. When they aren't it isn't Greyhawk that we are playing in but a very very sad imitation of it. Does that limit creativity? Yes but for the most part if a very positive way. On the other hand it makes for even more creativity in the back stories of the characters. A shift of attention from one aspect of the character to another. In my opinion a shift from one of the least important aspects to one of the most important aspects.</p><p></p><p>Even the settings we have now could be for the most part would be "better" in many ways if there was stricter adherence to the setting and enforcement of the setting what ever they might be. Many think that stricter enforcement isn't a good thing though many think it is. Mature role players(note I said role not roll) realize the rules and enforcement of them bring a setting more to life and with a sense of quasi realism. When the rules aren't enforced you don't have a setting but a poorly executed idea with no real shape or form. I've been to several chat sites that strictly adhere to the rules set for by their respective gaming systems. When you log into those sites they have many more players logged on and happily roleplaying their characters with a tenth of the strife or dissention compared to the FFRP sites that I have been to. </p><p></p><p>I know that many will view what I have said as an elitist attitude towards D&D and its settings. I would be saying the same thing if one of the settings was Shadowrun, VTM, Werewolf, Mage, Changling, Cyberpunk 2020, Wheel of Time or any of the other great role playing games out there. When a setting is made into a chat room the rules of the setting should be followed to ensure the integrity of the system or setting. No I'm not saying you should have to roll dice to see if you can walk across the floor without stumbling, that would be roll playing which I hate both online and in table top play.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fenmarel, post: 2559923"] To answer the question about trying to forbid or make it harder for certain races..... In a way I wouldn't mind one bit if they were but that wasn't the main point of the original post but a way of showing examples later. I started back in the AOL days myself after I completed my tour in the Marine Corps. I remember that there used to be a disclosure saying you had to be at least 13 to come to the chat site and if you weren't and found out later you would be banned. I happen to remember that several of the players actually did try to get the setting changed to Krynn though a very unsuccessful and short lived attempt. I don't think that if someone has been around from the beginning or just a few months has any bearing what so ever on the discussion at hand. Yes us "old fogies" have seen alot more than the newer players but throwing around time on site as a way to make it seem as an opinion must be right is the wrong way to go. That is why I don't do it though some would say I have every right to do so. I didn't mean that last bit as a flame of any kind to any single person so please only take it as the advice I was offering it as. I sincerely believe that if any OFFICIAL setting is used then the rules of the setting should be enforced. We might have a form of FFRP here BUT when one of the rooms is D&D setting with set rules they should be followed. When they aren't it isn't Greyhawk that we are playing in but a very very sad imitation of it. Does that limit creativity? Yes but for the most part if a very positive way. On the other hand it makes for even more creativity in the back stories of the characters. A shift of attention from one aspect of the character to another. In my opinion a shift from one of the least important aspects to one of the most important aspects. Even the settings we have now could be for the most part would be "better" in many ways if there was stricter adherence to the setting and enforcement of the setting what ever they might be. Many think that stricter enforcement isn't a good thing though many think it is. Mature role players(note I said role not roll) realize the rules and enforcement of them bring a setting more to life and with a sense of quasi realism. When the rules aren't enforced you don't have a setting but a poorly executed idea with no real shape or form. I've been to several chat sites that strictly adhere to the rules set for by their respective gaming systems. When you log into those sites they have many more players logged on and happily roleplaying their characters with a tenth of the strife or dissention compared to the FFRP sites that I have been to. I know that many will view what I have said as an elitist attitude towards D&D and its settings. I would be saying the same thing if one of the settings was Shadowrun, VTM, Werewolf, Mage, Changling, Cyberpunk 2020, Wheel of Time or any of the other great role playing games out there. When a setting is made into a chat room the rules of the setting should be followed to ensure the integrity of the system or setting. No I'm not saying you should have to roll dice to see if you can walk across the floor without stumbling, that would be roll playing which I hate both online and in table top play. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Archive Forums
Hosted Forums
Interactive Story Roleplaying (ISRP)
ISRP General Chit Chat
Crt
Top