Re JMS and B5, I agree that drama (tending to melodrama, but there's a place for that) and plot are his greatest strengths, while his weakness arguably lies in characterisation. G'kar and Londo are good characters, possibly because they represent their entire species (in more ways than one!), possibly because the actors are good ones. By contrast JMS' human characters have always tended to be very wooden and flat - perhaps it's the casting that's poor, but I suspect it's more than that.
Characterisation tends to be one of the strengths of Trek, a successful Star Trek series usually manages to produce some interesting/engaging characters, although there seem to be worryingly less in the recent (post-TNG) series. For me, Enterprise only really has Skip, but that's better than Voyager which had no one until Seven of Nine. I didn't like DS9 (hate the Trill*, hate the Bajorans and what they stand for, like the Cardassians though), so can't really comment on it.
*Actually the Trill Hosts seem to exemplify the perfect Federation citizen. Their only purpose in existence is to serve and obey, even their minds are/were largely under the control of their 'symbiote'. And they LIKE it.
Characterisation tends to be one of the strengths of Trek, a successful Star Trek series usually manages to produce some interesting/engaging characters, although there seem to be worryingly less in the recent (post-TNG) series. For me, Enterprise only really has Skip, but that's better than Voyager which had no one until Seven of Nine. I didn't like DS9 (hate the Trill*, hate the Bajorans and what they stand for, like the Cardassians though), so can't really comment on it.
*Actually the Trill Hosts seem to exemplify the perfect Federation citizen. Their only purpose in existence is to serve and obey, even their minds are/were largely under the control of their 'symbiote'. And they LIKE it.