trancejeremy
Adventurer
JoeGKushner said:1. Man starting out happy and cynical?
2. Man starting to slowly unveil that there are things man was not meant to know?
3. Man learning that there are indeed things beyond our keen and still struggling against it?
4. Man trying desperately to avoid dealing with these things from beyond?
5. Man inevitabily failing that and actually taking it a step further than H. P. did and actually have the world end?
Heck, the first four elements could've been lifted right out of many Lovecraft stories.
Well, I disagree. I can't think of many HPL characters that start off happy. Most are like HPL himself - gloomy, studious, artsy (poetry writing, anyway).
Secondly, I don't see how ItMoM has anything from beyond. Sutter Cane is the bad guy, and he's human. He's the source of all the craziness - his writings somehow become real, even his ability to create characters (ie, Sam Neil).
Thirdly, by the end of the movie, Sam Neil isn't struggling against it, he's enjoying it along with everyone else who has gone crazy. (That I admit, that does happen in some HPL stories, but generally only when the main character has weird ancestry)
By contrast, most of those things are very common in Stephen King's writings. A number of his books and short stories have apocalyptic endings. King has explored the idea of literary creations becoming real on a few occasions (like the Dark Half and a few others, IIRC). Sutter Cane is very similar to Stephen King in sound. The actual town of Hobb's End in the movie is much more like Stephen King's fictional towns than HPLs.
Yeah, HPL was a bit influence on King, but mostly on his early writings. ItMoM seems more based on King's later stuff.
Last edited: