Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D 2024 does not deserve to succeed
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Zuranthium" data-source="post: 9448224" data-attributes="member: 7046627"><p>That's not an argument of quality at all. Just an admission of wanting to go with the status quo for the sake of it.</p><p></p><p></p><p>You already have sunk costs, and have to spend WAY more money, by going along with 2024 D&D. Your older D&D books are invalidated and you now have to buy many more to keep up.</p><p></p><p>So what actually is there to be "invested" in here, that can't instead be done with a better product? It's already a new ruleset that has to be adopted. You're simply choosing to adopt the rules of a game that happens to be from the same company. It's like if a restaurant started selling chicken nuggets instead hamburgers, while deleting all the coupons you received from buying hamburgers, and you blindly insisting the chicken nuggets must be the best thing to eat, since you formerly bought hamburgers there.</p><p> </p><p></p><p>This is you putting words in someone's mouth, yet again. Also, people don't know what they like best if they don't experience alternatives. If people truly feel D&D is the best, having come to that conclusion from playing many other games, then sure. But it's frequently the case that people have only experienced a sliver of what exists.</p><p></p><p>I'd also posit that most people have a bunch of things they would ideally like to change about D&D. Supporting another game will result in a higher chance of those desires being fulfilled. Like, you can talk directly with the person making DC20, ditto for various other games. Whereas with D&D? Fat chance they listen to your advice. They can't even design "conjure minor elementals" properly. </p><p></p><p></p><p>D&D doesn't have less rules.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Look at how it plays, not a PDF. There are games to watch and for me the combat there, with the system not being in its final form yet and people still needing to spend some time getting acquainted with the rules, was more kinetic and interesting and engaging than in most "professional" 5E D&D games, a system that's been given many years for people to learn and yet is still a source of constant confusion for "professional" players.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Zuranthium, post: 9448224, member: 7046627"] That's not an argument of quality at all. Just an admission of wanting to go with the status quo for the sake of it. You already have sunk costs, and have to spend WAY more money, by going along with 2024 D&D. Your older D&D books are invalidated and you now have to buy many more to keep up. So what actually is there to be "invested" in here, that can't instead be done with a better product? It's already a new ruleset that has to be adopted. You're simply choosing to adopt the rules of a game that happens to be from the same company. It's like if a restaurant started selling chicken nuggets instead hamburgers, while deleting all the coupons you received from buying hamburgers, and you blindly insisting the chicken nuggets must be the best thing to eat, since you formerly bought hamburgers there. This is you putting words in someone's mouth, yet again. Also, people don't know what they like best if they don't experience alternatives. If people truly feel D&D is the best, having come to that conclusion from playing many other games, then sure. But it's frequently the case that people have only experienced a sliver of what exists. I'd also posit that most people have a bunch of things they would ideally like to change about D&D. Supporting another game will result in a higher chance of those desires being fulfilled. Like, you can talk directly with the person making DC20, ditto for various other games. Whereas with D&D? Fat chance they listen to your advice. They can't even design "conjure minor elementals" properly. D&D doesn't have less rules. Look at how it plays, not a PDF. There are games to watch and for me the combat there, with the system not being in its final form yet and people still needing to spend some time getting acquainted with the rules, was more kinetic and interesting and engaging than in most "professional" 5E D&D games, a system that's been given many years for people to learn and yet is still a source of constant confusion for "professional" players. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D 2024 does not deserve to succeed
Top