Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="TexasToaster" data-source="post: 9457976" data-attributes="member: 7047226">Maybe, but removing the words from 2014 was horrible.A tree has 2 million genes and a human was 20,000 genes.&nbsp; If you think a tree can be transmuted, being 100 times more complicated than a human, then I am confused about why that would be allowed.... what happens if the humanoid was a tree-based lifeform like a treant?My point being is that RaW does not specify what &quot;raw&quot; materials is.&nbsp; A cannibal would also differ as to the definition of someone being a material if it was 5 seconds before dying and 5 seconds after.If a dwarf sees a stack of marble blocks 20 feet high, does he not see each of the blocks as a component instead of a wall?&nbsp; There is nothing in the wording to stop someone from arguing with the DM &quot;RaW says I can!&quot;The removal of key words in locations makes me think some of the developers can't read or have never played the game.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="TexasToaster, post: 9457976, member: 7047226"] Maybe, but removing the words from 2014 was horrible. A tree has 2 million genes and a human was 20,000 genes. If you think a tree can be transmuted, being 100 times more complicated than a human, then I am confused about why that would be allowed.... what happens if the humanoid was a tree-based lifeform like a treant? My point being is that RaW does not specify what "raw" materials is. A cannibal would also differ as to the definition of someone being a material if it was 5 seconds before dying and 5 seconds after. If a dwarf sees a stack of marble blocks 20 feet high, does he not see each of the blocks as a component instead of a wall? There is nothing in the wording to stop someone from arguing with the DM "RaW says I can!" The removal of key words in locations makes me think some of the developers can't read or have never played the game. [/QUOTE]

Verification