Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Marshall" data-source="post: 6249519" data-attributes="member: 765">A. The Seeker is one of the under-supported messes. It still has a role that it can fulfill, if played well.B. Its a Primal Controller. and C. The Hunter isnt capable of anything but being an off-striker, let alone a controller. Its one of the poster children for how badly the E4e design team understood 4e.You're stuck on the name. Slayer, Fighter, Weaponmaster, Battlerager,... who cares what the Heavy Weapon Striker is called?!?Theres a handful of at-wills that fit that description, the vast majority dont. How would you replace Commander Strike, Hellish Rebuke, Vicious Mockery, Throw and Stab....?Sure, that why you shift the generic ones from the class lists to role or power source lists. The idea would be that Twin Strike for the Ranger gets Quarry damage and for the Fighter it marks.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Marshall, post: 6249519, member: 765"] A. The Seeker is one of the under-supported messes. It still has a role that it can fulfill, if played well. B. Its a Primal Controller. and C. The Hunter isnt capable of anything but being an off-striker, let alone a controller. Its one of the poster children for how badly the E4e design team understood 4e. You're stuck on the name. Slayer, Fighter, Weaponmaster, Battlerager,... who cares what the Heavy Weapon Striker is called?!? Theres a handful of at-wills that fit that description, the vast majority dont. How would you replace Commander Strike, Hellish Rebuke, Vicious Mockery, Throw and Stab....? Sure, that why you shift the generic ones from the class lists to role or power source lists. The idea would be that Twin Strike for the Ranger gets Quarry damage and for the Fighter it marks. [/QUOTE]

Verification