Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="TheSword" data-source="post: 9250956" data-attributes="member: 6879661">No, I agree with you about fixing things. I never said there is no problem. It’s an ongoing process. Just be clear on the problem you’re trying to fix.If the spell is the issue, cut out the loopholes that let spells be abused. They’re already doing it for 2024 with things like Banishment being an ongoing save etc. have it so Simulacrums can’t cast the simulacrum spell, forbiddance needs the boundary to be paced during the casting of the spell. I hope they dial a number of spells down a notch. Simulacrum was already on my list of home-nerfed spells, as was Tiny Hut. You bet forbiddance is on there too now. It’s a good shout.Having a disproportionate number of casters is a totally different issue.If you have a problem is the very fact that Magic able to reshape reality exists, well then I think that is different problem again.You say there is an issue with spells. I say fix the spells.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="TheSword, post: 9250956, member: 6879661"] No, I agree with you about fixing things. I never said there is no problem. It’s an ongoing process. Just be clear on the problem you’re trying to fix. If the spell is the issue, cut out the loopholes that let spells be abused. They’re already doing it for 2024 with things like Banishment being an ongoing save etc. have it so Simulacrums can’t cast the simulacrum spell, forbiddance needs the boundary to be paced during the casting of the spell. I hope they dial a number of spells down a notch. Simulacrum was already on my list of home-nerfed spells, as was Tiny Hut. You bet forbiddance is on there too now. It’s a good shout. Having a disproportionate number of casters is a totally different issue. If you have a problem is the very fact that Magic able to reshape reality exists, well then I think that is different problem again. You say there is an issue with spells. I say fix the spells. [/QUOTE]

Verification