NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="humble minion" data-source="post: 9540603" data-attributes="member: 5948">I voted red on spell storing, I have to admit.  It's potent to the point that the entire class is kinda built around it, and it really comes out of nowhere.  All of a sudden, your artificer who could last level use 2 3rd level spells per day, can now use 13.  II get that they were probably trying to beef up the alchemist (especially) that has no real combat options that mean anything at higher levels, but it's a wild power jump, and I think that's poor design.Bit glum about the whole UA, to be honest.  It just screams conservatism, don't rock the boat, minimal changes, and a failure to seriously address the things that were the real problem last time.  The poor old alchemist really needs a complete rethink if it's going to be a useful combat subclass, but it got almost nothing.  I quite like the dreadnought option for the Armorer, but if it isn't made VERY clear that Replicate Magic Item can be used on arcane armor's inbuilt weapons, and if both inbuilt weapons and armour can't be enhanced with Replicate Magic Item simultaneously, then I question how viable it'll be long term.  Also I yelled a bit about how if you get a tool profiency related to your subclass when you enter your subclass, and you already have that proficiency, you should be able to choose to double the proficiency bonus for that tool rather than just pick a different, unrelated one.Oh yeah, and the new survey format stinks on toast.  Fix the text boxes so we can read everything we write at once, give a feedback option when we vote red so we can say WHY we did, and for pete's sake add in a place to talk about general feedback rather than specific features or details.  This is D&D for crying out loud.  It's ALL ABOUT synergies and the interaction of abilities.  Feedback depends on context and design philosophy , and they're not giving us a place to talk about this stuff.</blockquote>

Verification