Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
D&D Settings but not D&D
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="VariSami" data-source="post: 6007648" data-attributes="member: 6698543"><p>This is actually a brief summary of a discussion I had last night. I happened to mention that I've been converting Planescape to 3.5 (essentially just the factions as affiliations - and I know it's been done before). He immediately asked: "But why D&D?"</p><p></p><p>I was baffled, really. Well, it's a D&D setting, right? AD&D to be precise, as he pointed out. I've never played AD&D except as video games and he pointed out that it was very different from 3.5, which I'm very familiar with. He commented on the fact that 3.5 rules would either make the game "tactical figure chess" or "something else with bad rules for it". I know that the rules are inflated towards combat but in my opinion there is a lot more to them and I don't completely agree with his judgment. He's ran 3.5 a lot, mind you, so it's not just stereotypes.</p><p></p><p>The way I see this is that D&D offers a lot of material that is true to Planescape. The other guy pointed out that Planechase is all about the factions and the cosmology, neither of which is specific to D&D according to him. I disagree with the latter, though: it's *the* D&D cosmology. It's a world in which anything D&D can come together in surprising combinations. Why would I disregard all that specific material simply because it requires book-keeping?</p><p></p><p>I can see where he's coming from. Yes, one could always opt for other systems such as GURPS or Shadows of Yesterday, even when playing D&D-inspired games. I agree that sometimes the rules baggage of 3.5 does consume from the role-playing experience. But when all that material is readily at hand in detail, instead of just vague ideas which one would need to adjust, I find the idea kind of absurd.</p><p></p><p>What's your take on the matter? Would Forgotten Realms, Eberron or Planescape (or any other setting for that matter) be more enjoyable with another system or is D&D an important part of them? I know I'll still go with 3.5 for that campaign but try to avoid too much tactical figure chess.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="VariSami, post: 6007648, member: 6698543"] This is actually a brief summary of a discussion I had last night. I happened to mention that I've been converting Planescape to 3.5 (essentially just the factions as affiliations - and I know it's been done before). He immediately asked: "But why D&D?" I was baffled, really. Well, it's a D&D setting, right? AD&D to be precise, as he pointed out. I've never played AD&D except as video games and he pointed out that it was very different from 3.5, which I'm very familiar with. He commented on the fact that 3.5 rules would either make the game "tactical figure chess" or "something else with bad rules for it". I know that the rules are inflated towards combat but in my opinion there is a lot more to them and I don't completely agree with his judgment. He's ran 3.5 a lot, mind you, so it's not just stereotypes. The way I see this is that D&D offers a lot of material that is true to Planescape. The other guy pointed out that Planechase is all about the factions and the cosmology, neither of which is specific to D&D according to him. I disagree with the latter, though: it's *the* D&D cosmology. It's a world in which anything D&D can come together in surprising combinations. Why would I disregard all that specific material simply because it requires book-keeping? I can see where he's coming from. Yes, one could always opt for other systems such as GURPS or Shadows of Yesterday, even when playing D&D-inspired games. I agree that sometimes the rules baggage of 3.5 does consume from the role-playing experience. But when all that material is readily at hand in detail, instead of just vague ideas which one would need to adjust, I find the idea kind of absurd. What's your take on the matter? Would Forgotten Realms, Eberron or Planescape (or any other setting for that matter) be more enjoyable with another system or is D&D an important part of them? I know I'll still go with 3.5 for that campaign but try to avoid too much tactical figure chess. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
D&D Settings but not D&D
Top