d20 Logo News

[Wulf Ratbane]

There will be the OGL and Wizards D&D products period. No d20 STL (tiered or otherwise) to be even more clear.

http://www.enworld.org/showthread.php?p=3876623#post3876623

 

[HalWhitewyrm]

http://www.enworld.org/showthread.php?p=3876623#post3876623

There will be the OGL and Wizards D&D products period. No d20 STL (tiered or otherwise) to be even more clear.

So long and thank you for the fish.

 

[Ranger REG]

Sooo... What will this forum be about? Discussion about the current d20STL (v6.0)?

 

[Morrus]

Sooo... What will this forum be about? Discussion about the current d20STL (v6.0)?

Maybe there's a strong argument to merge the two forums; but we'll wait a while and see how each develops.

 

[Ranger REG]

Maybe there's a strong argument to merge the two forums; but we'll wait a while and see how each develops.

This does not bode well.

I prefer the OGL to be a generic content license, now it's going to be a WotC-specific content license, complete with WotC-owned trademark use. I hope I'm wrong with the previous sentence.

 

[Kesh]

This does not bode well.

I prefer the OGL to be a generic content license, now it's going to be a WotC-specific content license, complete with WotC-owned trademark use. I hope I'm wrong with the previous sentence.

I'm not sure where you're getting that from. OGL still sounds like it's going to be a generic content license, but they're considering adding legalese to allow folks to do a "compatibility" claim in their product.

 

[Morrus]

This does not bode well.

I prefer the OGL to be a generic content license, now it's going to be a WotC-specific content license, complete with WotC-owned trademark use. I hope I'm wrong with the previous sentence.

My opinion is based on expected forum traffic, nothing else. Looks like "d20 STL" conversation is likely to die with the d20 STL. I run a messageboard, not a gaming license.

 

[Ranger REG]

I'm not sure where you're getting that from. OGL still sounds like it's going to be a generic content license, but they're considering adding legalese to allow folks to do a "compatibility" claim in their product.

Compatible to "4th Edition Dungeons & Dragons," and last I checked, that is still WotC's owned trademark. Hence, trademark use.

I just hope it is an option, not mandatory ... the "4e compatibility claim" part.