Dahak said:For the sake of full compliancy, shouldn't the term "d20" be excised from the title page and the file name? I'm making a hunch here, but I believe the name of the document for section 15 purposes is "Modern System Reference Document", and WotC is claiming "d20" in that context as a trademark for which you'd need seperate permission (e.g. the D20STL).
Standard disclaimer... I am not a lawyer. This isn't legal advice. Yadda. Yadda. Dabba. Doo.
Jeph said:Not everyone hangs out in the d20 games forum on ENworld. Some people are bound to not know about Kenjib's .pdf.![]()
tburdett said:
No, and those that don't deserve our sympathy.![]()
Mistwell said:I just hope this doesn't mean people will use this PDF instead of buying d20 Modern, since support for the product by WOTC and 3rd party publishers will be based on sales of the Core product. If they think nobody is buying it, they won't make products for it.