Turjan said:I always found this to be a very stupid tagline. If a setting has to define itself by what it not is, this is usually not a good sign. Talislanta has enough positive reasons to like it
.
Turjan said:I always found this to be a very stupid tagline. If a setting has to define itself by what it not is, this is usually not a good sign. Talislanta has enough positive reasons to like it
.
Turjan said:I always found this to be a very stupid tagline. If a setting has to define itself by what it not is, this is usually not a good sign. Talislanta has enough positive reasons to like it
.
dvvega said:I've only played in Talislanta once, never ran a game, and I loved it. I loved the flavour/atmosphere and even made my own Deck for my spell caster.
The concern I have about d20 Talislanta is the way they handle the races in the game. Additionally Talislanta wasn't class/level based but experience point based. You would spend XP to improve abilities. If this isn't done "right" it could kill it.
D
I never doubted that it might be effectiveThe Horror said:Hey, that line sold me on the game a little over a year ago.![]()
JoeBlank said:An intro kit to the setting and rules is being offered as this week's freebie on DrivethruRPG.com
http://www.drivethrurpg.com/catalog/index.php