Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
DALL·E 3 does amazing D&D art
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jfdlsjfd" data-source="post: 9236391" data-attributes="member: 42856"><p>You don't need to do that. The AI doesn't interpret your prompt to select an image in a database and add or remove elements. The model doesn't contain any image. Even a small prompt will give you something different from what it was trained on, but there is always a chance, like the one million monkeys typing a piece from Shakespeare, that it will generate something identical to an existing artwork. The chance increase if you're prompting specifically to skew the generation toward it. But it will need a lot of conscious effort to infringe copyright, hence the copyright infringement being on the user.</p><p></p><p>Also, you could statistically recreate a copyrighted image even if the AI engine was trained only on public domain images or with image it was licensed to, like Adobe's. Prompt with a close enough depiction of Mickey Mouse without mentionning its name and you could certainly acheive something that is close enough to be infringing copyright after enough tries.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Try it. Generate 1,000 images with "a painted portrait of a man". It's difficult to imagine something more generic. Chances of you replicating a real portrait of a man it was trained on are close to nil. Even if you try to skew it by saying "a 17th century portrait of a man" it will certainly not generate something identical to an already existing 17th century portrait it was trained on.</p><p></p><p>On the other hand, a very short prompt "Jack Sparrow" might very well generate something recognizable as Jack Sparrow. But if the user use that as a prompt and redistribute the work, I'd say it's his fault...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Much like the paint vendor doesn't get sued when you use their paint to paint Mickey Mouse and sell it. And you don't get any warning from Microsoft that using word implies the risk of infringing copyright (should you try to write fanfiction about an horrible soapy teenager love story between a werewolf and a vampire).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jfdlsjfd, post: 9236391, member: 42856"] You don't need to do that. The AI doesn't interpret your prompt to select an image in a database and add or remove elements. The model doesn't contain any image. Even a small prompt will give you something different from what it was trained on, but there is always a chance, like the one million monkeys typing a piece from Shakespeare, that it will generate something identical to an existing artwork. The chance increase if you're prompting specifically to skew the generation toward it. But it will need a lot of conscious effort to infringe copyright, hence the copyright infringement being on the user. Also, you could statistically recreate a copyrighted image even if the AI engine was trained only on public domain images or with image it was licensed to, like Adobe's. Prompt with a close enough depiction of Mickey Mouse without mentionning its name and you could certainly acheive something that is close enough to be infringing copyright after enough tries. Try it. Generate 1,000 images with "a painted portrait of a man". It's difficult to imagine something more generic. Chances of you replicating a real portrait of a man it was trained on are close to nil. Even if you try to skew it by saying "a 17th century portrait of a man" it will certainly not generate something identical to an already existing 17th century portrait it was trained on. On the other hand, a very short prompt "Jack Sparrow" might very well generate something recognizable as Jack Sparrow. But if the user use that as a prompt and redistribute the work, I'd say it's his fault... Much like the paint vendor doesn't get sued when you use their paint to paint Mickey Mouse and sell it. And you don't get any warning from Microsoft that using word implies the risk of infringing copyright (should you try to write fanfiction about an horrible soapy teenager love story between a werewolf and a vampire). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
DALL·E 3 does amazing D&D art
Top