NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Jfdlsjfd" data-source="post: 9236776" data-attributes="member: 42856">I am pretty sure the higher-end commercial use will not be troubled with IP. They'll train on models that they got the right to by licensing (or outright buying) a stock photo website, and for Hollywood I a pretty sure there will be quickly enough retiring actor that will be glad to sell a perpetual right to their image in exchange for a luxurious end of life. Or talentuous hobbyists with a main job that would gladly sign a deal for rehearsal training of an AI every week-end for a few month in exchange of a big amount of cash...  Once you have an AI able to recreate you, and to generate consistant shots of an edited real actor, they will need only the rights to 10 to 20 actors to do full CGI AI-acting for the whole industry. The tech might not be (fully?) ready yet, but it will be refined by the time the cast is assembled and the deal the actors got that prevented using image without selling it before will become irrelevant. The lawmakers will either strengthens copyright holder's right (and AI generation will generate profits mostly for the big names) or make training available to all and make everyone including the little ones able to profit from it. The result will be irrelevant for the jobs currently held and facing the prospect of being replaced, because it will be the same either way (in many if not most fields, including intellectual jobs and especially intellectual jobs).Indeed. And let's not blame the AI for problems that are coming from the taboo topic.</blockquote>

Verification