Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mind of tempest" data-source="post: 8711625" data-attributes="member: 7029233">give we are talking about a leisure product which was never needed, using the word needed is utterly wrong, there is a desire for it and it does not make anything worse so it is perfectly livable to do so.no one can agree on how to lead most of our nations does not mean we are not to try (metaphor), I care not about mechanics as I can live with most.I see nothing wrong with overlap as if we got rid of overlap the bard would have to go by definition, and the people who want reproductive rituals with dragons would whip up a hell of a storm.6e may never happen thus there is no point discussing it.not every idea works with reflavouring besides I am not always allowed to.they disagree on mechanics oddly not thematics and the thematics are what will sell.what is sci fi or not is irrelevant.did we need the artificer for 5e, no but we got it so for dark sun the psion should be their.give it is a social game it is not as irrelevant as you like to pretend.9 books for spells and a massive bloat of a refluffed multiclass is not unforceful.do not play coy come up with something supported by the fiction show me the teeth of your point?where did I say I wanted a weak telepath? besides you need the stat improvements are needed and you are not supposed to need feats.okay so what else are they supposed to make more bloated subclasses that barely fit or all pile onto of each other?as I say the thematics will sell it to the new guys, not mechanics how do I know this? I am one of the new guys and the thematics made me fall in love.</blockquote>

Verification