Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Data from a million DnDBeyond character sheets?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hussar" data-source="post: 9069451" data-attributes="member: 22779"><p>But, here's the point. You can't play the victim card that you're getting dogpiled for liking the fighter when every single time anyone suggests they change the fighter, you jump in and tell everyone how much you like the fighter the way it is and don't want it changed. </p><p></p><p>IOW, while I don't generally go into fighter appreciation threads, I do go into the ones where they are suggesting that things be changed for the fighter. And every... single... time... it's exactly the same. Couple of pages of productive discussion that is then derailed by very loud shouting down that fighters must never be changed. Or, if they are changed, they must only be changed in very specific ways.</p><p></p><p>As I stated more than a few times in the fighter threads, I absolutely know that I'm whistling in the wind here. There is zero chance that WotC is going to change the fighter. I know that. They have zero incentive to change it. The most played class for years? Yeah, you don't mess with that. Of course you don't. </p><p></p><p>Which is why it gets doubly frustrating when every conversation about making any changes gets shouted down. Everyone who wants changes to the fighter absolutely knows that it's never going to happen. It's in the same category as Warlords and Psionics. It's just NOT going to happen. There's just no way that they will ever get past that 70% mark. Good grief, people are losing their poop over new weapon mastery rules and that's such a minor, basic change. Making an actual, significant modification to fighters? Nope.</p><p></p><p>It wouldn't bother me so much except that anything that doesn't have the WotC seal of approval might as well not even exist as far as my players go. They just aren't interested. I think mostly because they haven't actually gotten to play through what WotC has on tap yet. Why would you look further if you have lots of options already? Don't particularly like the Fighter? Oh well, guess I'll play a Ranger or Rogue instead.</p><p></p><p>It is rather discouraging sometimes. <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/erm.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":erm:" title="Erm :erm:" data-shortname=":erm:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hussar, post: 9069451, member: 22779"] But, here's the point. You can't play the victim card that you're getting dogpiled for liking the fighter when every single time anyone suggests they change the fighter, you jump in and tell everyone how much you like the fighter the way it is and don't want it changed. IOW, while I don't generally go into fighter appreciation threads, I do go into the ones where they are suggesting that things be changed for the fighter. And every... single... time... it's exactly the same. Couple of pages of productive discussion that is then derailed by very loud shouting down that fighters must never be changed. Or, if they are changed, they must only be changed in very specific ways. As I stated more than a few times in the fighter threads, I absolutely know that I'm whistling in the wind here. There is zero chance that WotC is going to change the fighter. I know that. They have zero incentive to change it. The most played class for years? Yeah, you don't mess with that. Of course you don't. Which is why it gets doubly frustrating when every conversation about making any changes gets shouted down. Everyone who wants changes to the fighter absolutely knows that it's never going to happen. It's in the same category as Warlords and Psionics. It's just NOT going to happen. There's just no way that they will ever get past that 70% mark. Good grief, people are losing their poop over new weapon mastery rules and that's such a minor, basic change. Making an actual, significant modification to fighters? Nope. It wouldn't bother me so much except that anything that doesn't have the WotC seal of approval might as well not even exist as far as my players go. They just aren't interested. I think mostly because they haven't actually gotten to play through what WotC has on tap yet. Why would you look further if you have lots of options already? Don't particularly like the Fighter? Oh well, guess I'll play a Ranger or Rogue instead. It is rather discouraging sometimes. :erm: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Data from a million DnDBeyond character sheets?
Top