Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Erechel" data-source="post: 7409368" data-attributes="member: 6784868">I really, really never complained on martials being weak. Look up, even as I've being answering you: Power wise, fighters are great. They can be a little boring, though, if the only thing they can do is I attack. You realize that you are broadly and consistently ignoring what I say and twisting it and insulting me because you don't like a thing I could theoretically allow as a DM, or attempt as a player? Are you conscious that you are not concerned at all about balance or the game, and you have enclosed into a war trench against anything I've said? I've quoted the rules I use, that are already there. Which ones I'm ignoring?Not to mention the disrespect, something that I've consistently avoided. As I've said prior: you don't like it on principle, and it is a fact. And I've even given you a way to counter this claim: bring a better approach. This may come in a table. In fact, in many tables I've been it has come around in one or another way. This is one approach, based on rules already there. It could be better, yes, probably. So far, it is the only one I've tried. Bring another one, and I will try it too. It is a counter-caster measure, yes, as a disarm is a counter-martial measure. It is an analogy: I hope that you understand what an analogy is, and what it is used for.So, for now, I'm going to ignore you. Just because it isn't worth it. I can manage disentions on my thought. I can manage discussions. I can manage criticism on my decisions. What I don't want to is to manage is disrespect and gross manipulations and distortions of what I'm saying so you can pass by my real arguments, and convince... who? that you are right without actually discussing.</blockquote>

Verification