• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

[Dec] What are you reading?


log in or register to remove this ad

I was reading Paul Veyne's Did the Greeks Believe in their Myths?: An essay on the constitutive imagination, but became rather bored and unimpressed with it. So far I'm not impressed with the works of French classicists (I'll put Robert Turcan on the list as boring and pedantic, as well).

It may be just that French doesn't translate as well into English as German does. I've found German works (e.g. those of Burkert) to be far more intellectually exciting, even when I disagree with them.

So, Redfield's Nature and Culture in the Iliad: The Tragedy of Hector was up next. Quite involving, and very useful.
 

isidorus said:
Earlier today I finished The Oath of SwordsBY: David Weber.

GodStalk By: P.C. Hodgell

The RuneLord Series By: David Farland
Oath of Swords is one of my favorite books, along with the sequal The War God's Own. (Read both of them here )

I need to re-read Godstalk, since I just bought the two sequals from SFBC.

I read the first RuneLord book and loved it; need to get the others.
 

tetsujin28 said:
I was reading Paul Veyne's Did the Greeks Believe in their Myths?: An essay on the constitutive imagination, but became rather bored and unimpressed with it. So far I'm not impressed with the works of French classicists (I'll put Robert Turcan on the list as boring and pedantic, as well).

You're not alone - I couldn't finish it either.
 


I just finished Skyripper by David Drake. An okay book but it would make a better d20 miodern game. Next up is Dr Jeckel and Mr Hyde.
 

Let's see, I finished Dan Simmons' Hyperion and Fall of Hyperion recently. That is one amazing story. I'm now reading The Dragon Path, which is a collection of the short fiction of Kenneth Morris. He's a little-known fantasist from the early 20th. I like his command of the language. Something like Lord Dunsany, but the stories seem to be a bit deeper than Dunsany's.

Two things I've given up on recently are Neuromancer and Romance of the Three Kingdoms. I barely began the latter, not giving it enough of a chance, given its status, before becoming distracted. But Neuromancer, God, how dated and boring; I didn't care about the protagonist and Gibson's descriptions were simply not engaging or intriguing. I read more than half and then just threw it down. I have The Difference Engine on the shelf, I hope that's better. Otherwise I'll just stick to Neal Stephenson, thank you Mr. Gibson.
 

I'm just finishing a re-read of Return of the King so the stuff is fresh when I see the film. Of course, I have over a month to wait until it gets here in Russia :(

after that I'll proabbably turn to George RR Martin's series.
 
Last edited:


RenoOfTheTurks said:
Two things I've given up on recently are Neuromancer and Romance of the Three Kingdoms. I barely began the latter, not giving it enough of a chance, given its status, before becoming distracted. But Neuromancer, God, how dated and boring; I didn't care about the protagonist and Gibson's descriptions were simply not engaging or intriguing. I read more than half and then just threw it down. I have The Difference Engine on the shelf, I hope that's better. Otherwise I'll just stick to Neal Stephenson, thank you Mr. Gibson.
Neuromancer was always over-hyped hooey. Three Kingdoms, though, is full of rock-em sock-em robots in comparison.
 

Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top