Still, I'd think an elemental artificer would have been in the book, given that Eberron exists.
That would be publishing something that isn't a Wizard and we don't do that in post-essentials 4E

Still, I'd think an elemental artificer would have been in the book, given that Eberron exists.
This.Personally, I don't care for arcane, since warlocks prove it to be a method and not a source, while elemental is a distinct source.
Yet another wizard sub-class that would have worked better as a warlock.
Oh, yes, I get "spells" from "entities" who "share" their power with me.
But it's totally genies and supernatural ferrets, so that's why I am a wizard, and you are a Warlock.
Still, elementalist sorcerer and elemental monk (?!) might be pretty interesting. I'm normally not one to gripe about yet-another wizard subclass, and perhaps the mechanics will be interesting, but FRIG, man, what does it take to become a frickin' WARLOCK 'round these parts?
Maybe if my supernatural ferret is eeeeeeeevil....