Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
Deciding Between PFTPG and D&D4e/E. Also, Four Simple Questions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="IronWolf" data-source="post: 5332297" data-attributes="member: 21076"><p>You've already received a lot of great responses...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I really think character unbalance, even in 3.5, was mainly only a real problem when you had an optimizer in a group that took advantage of every feat or power that they could. In my groups we had people playing what would likely be considered non-optimal characters and it still worked out pretty well where we each had something to contribute to the party.</p><p></p><p>I do think even with an optimizer that Pathfinder brings some of the power into balance better than 3.5, but not necessarily completely removing the problem in that situation.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>To me it is all the healing surges and powers that start to make 4e "seem" like a video game.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You can easily play Pathfinder with minis. Our group has played 3.5 mini-less and we are playing Pathfinder with minis for some situations and mini-less for others. It really depends on the group's preferences and the comfort level of the DM. For most groups it is probably easier to use minis and a battlemat.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You can play more than one character, but I would encourage one not to. The game has always seemed more fun to me when you focus on one character, even if it means your party might be less than the standard 4 characters or so. </p><p></p><p>Someone else has suggested gestalt if you truly only have one or two players. I would consider that option before playing two characters.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Errata is something you will have to deal with in the RPG world unfortunately. A necessary evil I guess due to the niche market. The cool thing with Paizo is that their additional printings of books include the errata and they update their PDFs which you can get if you bought it off their site.</p><p></p><p>Not sure about the errata on the GameMasters Guide, I must have missed the uproar if there was a lot in it. The APG has been seeing a fair number of complaints, so it might be worth waiting for the second printing, though I have a first printing (and the PDF) and am really not that bothered by it. But if errata bothers you, catch the second printing of the APG.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Pathfinder is a great system. It has really brought some new energy and enthusiasm to me. The writing it good, the art is awesome for inspiration and the rules work. It *feels* like the D&D I want to play.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="IronWolf, post: 5332297, member: 21076"] You've already received a lot of great responses... I really think character unbalance, even in 3.5, was mainly only a real problem when you had an optimizer in a group that took advantage of every feat or power that they could. In my groups we had people playing what would likely be considered non-optimal characters and it still worked out pretty well where we each had something to contribute to the party. I do think even with an optimizer that Pathfinder brings some of the power into balance better than 3.5, but not necessarily completely removing the problem in that situation. To me it is all the healing surges and powers that start to make 4e "seem" like a video game. You can easily play Pathfinder with minis. Our group has played 3.5 mini-less and we are playing Pathfinder with minis for some situations and mini-less for others. It really depends on the group's preferences and the comfort level of the DM. For most groups it is probably easier to use minis and a battlemat. You can play more than one character, but I would encourage one not to. The game has always seemed more fun to me when you focus on one character, even if it means your party might be less than the standard 4 characters or so. Someone else has suggested gestalt if you truly only have one or two players. I would consider that option before playing two characters. Errata is something you will have to deal with in the RPG world unfortunately. A necessary evil I guess due to the niche market. The cool thing with Paizo is that their additional printings of books include the errata and they update their PDFs which you can get if you bought it off their site. Not sure about the errata on the GameMasters Guide, I must have missed the uproar if there was a lot in it. The APG has been seeing a fair number of complaints, so it might be worth waiting for the second printing, though I have a first printing (and the PDF) and am really not that bothered by it. But if errata bothers you, catch the second printing of the APG. Pathfinder is a great system. It has really brought some new energy and enthusiasm to me. The writing it good, the art is awesome for inspiration and the rules work. It *feels* like the D&D I want to play. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
Deciding Between PFTPG and D&D4e/E. Also, Four Simple Questions
Top